Some critical and exegetical considerations on the relation between faith and reason that can be drawn from Kierkegaard’s characterisation of the Knights of Faith Abraham and Mary in Fear and Trembling
Abstract
Kierkegaard refers to the figure of Knight of Faith to sustain a definite picture of the relation between faith and reason, to argue that faith cannot be rationally buttressed or justified. In Fear and Trembling, he identifies Abraham and the Virgin Mary as Knights of Faith. The paper: (1) Illustrates the notion of the Knight of Faith focusing on Abraham, the Knight of Faith par excellence; (2) Considers two paradoxes the sacrificial binding of Isaac in Genesis may involve; one involving inconsistency between God’s command and moral standards, and a contradiction between God’s command and a blessing Abraham was offered; arguing that there is no ground to assert that Abraham would have been aware of the former; (3) Claims that Mary ought to be characterised as a Knight of Faith in light of a paradox involving a blessing she was promised, and certain concrete situations and events. The paper refers to historico-exegetical scholarly work to argue that, contrary to what Kierkegaard claims, when considering the attitude of these two figures when facing these paradoxes, one cannot sustain any picture regarding the relation between faith and reason.
References
Adams, Robert Merrihew. 1990. “The Knight of Faith.” Faith and Philosophy 7 (4): 383–95. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil19907433.
Aquinas, Thomas. 2017. Summa Theologiæ. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New Advent, Online Edition. Accessed March 22, 2025. https://www.newadvent.org/summa/.
Berthelot, Katell. 2007. “Jewish Views of Human Sacrifice.” In Human Sacrifice in Jewish and Christian Tradition, edited by Karin Finsterbusch, Armin Lange, and K. F. Diethard Römheld, 259–71. Leiden: Brill.
Carlisle, Clare. 2016. “Humble Courage: Kierkegaard on Abraham and Mary.” Literature and Theology 30 (3): 278–92.
Carr, Karen L. 1996. “The Offense of Reason and the Passion of Faith: Kierkegaard and Anti-Rationalism.” Faith and Society: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers 13 (2): 236–51. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil199613220.
Cahyawicaksana, Yohanes Kukuh, and Fery Yohanes. 2022. “Faith and Reason: An Inquiry into the Concept of Faith in Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling.” International Journal of Indonesian Philosophy and Theology 3 (1): 53–68. https://doi.org/10.47043/ijipth.v3i1.29.
Copleston, Frederick C. 1993a. A History of Philosophy. Volume II. New York: Image Books.
———. 1993b. A History of Philosophy. Volume III. New York: Image Books.
Della Torre, Frank, and Ryan Kemp. 2022. “Kierkegaard’s Strong Anti-Rationalism: Offense as a Propaedeutic to Faith.” Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook 27 (1): 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2022-0010.
Derrida, Jacques. 1999. “La littérature au secret. Une filiation impossible.” In Donner la mort, 161–209. Paris: Galilée.
Gardiner, Patrick. 1988. Kierkegaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gaventa, Beverly Roberts. 1999. Mary: Glimpses of the Mother of Jesus. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Hannay, Alastair. 1982. Kierkegaard. London: Routledge.
Herbert, Robert. 1961. “Two of Kierkegaard’s Uses of ‘Paradox’.” The Philosophical Review 70 (1): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183404.
Hertzberg, Arthur. 2008. Judaism. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
Kant, Immanuel. 2008. Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone. Translated by Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt H. Hudson. New York: HarperOne.
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1994. Fear and Trembling. Translated by Walter Lowrie. London: Princeton University Press.
———. 1985. Philosophical Fragments. Translated by Edna H. Hong and Howard V. Hong. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
———. 1992. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments: Volume I–II. Translated by Edna H. Hong and Howard V. Hong. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
———. 2002. Provocations: Spiritual Writings of Kierkegaard. Compiled and edited by Charles E. Moore. East Sussex: Bruderhof Foundation.
———. 1994. The Book on Adler. Translated by Walter Lowrie. London: Princeton University Press.
———. 1958. The Journal of Kierkegaard 1834–1854: A Selection. Edited and translated by Alexander Due. London: Fontana Books.
Kilpatrick, G. D. 2001. “Jesus, His Family, and His Disciples.” In The Historical Jesus: A Sheffield Reader, 13–28. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Lettsome, Raquel. 2021. “Mary’s Slave Song: The Tensions and Turnarounds of Faithfully Reading Doule in the Magnificat.” Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 75 (1): 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020964320961670.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1995. A Short History of Ethics. London: Routledge.
Mooney, Edward. 1986. “Abraham and Dilemma: Kierkegaard’s Teleological Suspension Revisited.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (1/2): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160918.
Pirkei Avot. On-line Edition. Accessed March 22, 2025. https://www.sefaria.org/Pirkei_Avot?tab=contents.
Pixley, Jorge, and Clodovis, Boff. 1989. The Bible, the Church, and the Poor. New York: Burns & Oates.
Read, Stephen. 1995. Thinking About Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Christopher. 2007. “Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling, the Sacrifice of Isaac, and the Critique of Christendom.” In Human Sacrifice in Jewish and Christian Tradition, edited by Karin Finsterbusch, Armin Lange, and K. F. Diethard Römheld, 259–71. Leiden: Brill.
Sagi, Avi. 1992. “The Suspension of the Ethical and the Religious Meaning of Ethics in Kierkegaard’s Thought.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 32 (2): 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01315426.
Stiltner, Brian. 1993. “Who Can Understand Abraham? The Relation of God and Morality in Kierkegaard and Aquinas.” Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (2): 221–45.
Storm, Anthony D. Anthony Storm’s Commentary on Kierkegaard. Accessed December 24, 2024. https://sorenkierkegaard.org/.
Copyright (c) 2025 Forum Philosophicum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- When submitting a text, the author declares that he/she is the Author of the article (hereinafter referred to as the “Work”) and:
- he/she owns the exclusive and unlimited copyright to the Work,
- is entitled to dispose of the copyright to the Work.
Declares that it does not infringe any third party copyrights or legal rights.
Declares that there is no conflict of interest.
2. At the same time, the Author grants the Ignatianum University in Cracowa royalty-free, non-exclusive and territorially unlimited licence to use the Work in the following fields of exploitation:
- recording the Work in a hard copy, as well as on a digital or magnetic medium;
- reproduction of the Work using any technique, without limitation of the number of editions or copies;
- distribution of the Work and its copies on any medium, including marketing, sale, lending, and rental;
- introduction of the Work into a computer memory;
- disseminating the Work in information networks, including in the Internet;
- public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to it at a time and place of their own choosing;
- within the scope of dependent rights to the Work, including in particular the right to make necessary changes to the Work resulting from editorial and methodical development, as well as to translate the Work into foreign languages;
The licence is granted from the moment of the transfer of the Work to the Ignatianum University in Cracow. The Ignatianum University in Cracow is entitled to grant further sub-licences to the Work within the scope of the right granted. The licence is time-limited and it is granted for a period of 15 years, starting from the date of its granting.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their text online (e.g. in their institution’s repository or on the institution’s website) before or during the submission process as this may lead to beneficial exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published text (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following portals of research associations:
- ResearchGate
- SSRN
- Academia.edu
- Selected Works
- Academic Search
