Between Object and Event

The Iconic Object in Jean-Luc Marion

  • Ezequiel Murga Catholic University of the Most Holy Conception
Keywords: event, givenness, hermeneutics, icon, Marion, Jean‑Luc, objectification, Pascal, Blaise, phenomenology

Abstract

This article proposes the concept of the iconic object as a phenomenological category capable of reconciling givenness and objectivity. Drawing on Jean‑Luc Marion’s distinction between idol and icon in his early theological works, and between object and event in his phenomenological writings, I argue that not every objectification is metaphysical. Beyond the a priori reduction that guarantees certainty by suppressing excess, there is a possible a posteriori objectification that recognizes its derivative character and preserves the distance that givenness requires. The iconic object designates precisely this mode of objectification: one that receives the given without exhausting it. The notion finds conceptual support in Marion’s “iconic use of concepts” and in Pascal’s doctrine of the three orders, which allows for the subordination rather than the abolition of metaphysics. Finally, the article explores how this framework can illuminate various fields such as medicine, education, and ecology.

References

Carraud, Vincent. 1992. Pascal et la philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Gschwandtner, Christina M. 2014. Degrees of Givenness: On Saturation in Jean‑Luc Marion. New York: Fordham University Press.

Jones, Tamsin. 2011. A Genealogy of Marion’s Philosophy of Religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Marion, Jean‑Luc. 1981. Sur la théologie blanche de Descartes: Analogie, création des vérités éternelles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

—. 1995. God without Being: Hors‑Texte. Translated by Thomas A. Carlson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

—. 1999. On Descartes’ Metaphysical Prism: The Constitution and the Limits of onto‑Theo‑Logy in Cartesian Thought. Translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

—. 2001. The Idol and Distance: Five Studies. Translated by Thomas A. Carlson. New York: Fordham University Press.

—. 2002a. Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness. Translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

—. 2002b. In Excess: Studies of Saturated Phenomena. Translated by Robyn Horner. New York: Fordham University Press.

—. 2004. The Crossing of the Visible. Translated by James K.A. Smith. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

—. 2008. The Visible and the Revealed. Translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner. New York: Fordham University Press.

—. 2015. Ce que nous voyons et ce qui apparaît. Bry‑sur‑Marne: INA.

—. 2016. Reprise du donné. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

—. 2020. Negative Certainties. Translated by Stephen E. Lewis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

—. 2023. La métaphysique et après: essais sur l’historicité et sur les époques de la philosophie. Paris: Bernard Grasset.

Murga, Ezequiel Daniel. 2022. “El discernimiento hermenéutico en Jean‑Luc Marion.” Revista de Filosofía 47 (2): 455‑470. https://doi.org/10.5209/resf.71121

Pascal, Blaise. 2004. Pensées. Translated by Roger Ariew. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Roggero, Jorge Luis. 2019. Hermenéutica del amor: La fenomenología de La donación de Jean‑Luc Marion en diálogo con la fenomenología del joven Heidegger. Buenos Aires: SB Editorial.

—. 2020. “Los Cuatro Niveles de Hermenéutica En La Fenomenología de J.‑L. Marion.” Revista de Filosofía 45 (1): 141–60. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/resf.61389.

Steinbock, Anthony J. 2007a. Phenomenology and Mysticism: The Verticality of Religious Experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

—. 2007b. “The Poor Phenomenon: Marion and the Problem of Givenness.” Alter: Revue de Phénoménologie 15: 7–21.

Published
2026-06-13
How to Cite
Murga, E. (2026). Between Object and Event: The Iconic Object in Jean-Luc Marion. Forum Philosophicum, 31(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.35765/forphil.2026.3101.03