Mystical platonic love in Leo Hebrew and Elías Canetti
Abstract
Judah Abravanel, better known as Leo Hebrew, a 16th-century Sephardic intellectual, defines in The Dialogues of Love the concept that appears in the title. His work, a philosophical treatise with Neoplatonic overtones – bringing together all that previous thinkers had written on this noble sentiment – enjoyed great popularity in his time, becoming a model for his contemporaries. It was translated into Spanish by Inca Garcilaso de la Vega. Miguel de Cervantes polemicizes with it in the prologue to the first part of Don Quixote, suggesting that the love it describes is far removed from reality. The vision of an idealised love, which the lover Philo feels for the chaste Sophia, led Elias Canetti – a Bulgarian-born Sephardic thinker – to create the portrait of Dr. Sonne, a key figure in the play Das Augenspiel (The Play of the Eyes). Love for a divine Intellect, arrived at only through intellectual effort employed in philosophical dialogue, can be seen as the manifestation of a mystical love with Judaic roots. Leo Hebrew – born in Portugal in the 16th century and exiled in Italy – chose the language of his new homeland as his language of creation; Elias Canetti – born in Bulgaria in the 20th century and living in Switzerland – wrote in German. However, these characters, distant in time and space, are united by their Judeo-Spanish origin and, related to it, by the enormous baggage of the Hebrew exegetical tradition that leads both to a very similar laudation of a cold, purely intellectual love. The article presents the affinity of thought between both writers – who can be considered Spanish given their Sephardic origin- with regard to an intellectual mysticism expressed through the love for the Intellect written with a capital letter.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ignatianum University in Cracow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.