The Concept of Freedom of Speech and Its Limitations from the Perspective of Józef Tischner’s Philosophy
Abstract
This article attempts to conceptualise freedom of speech in the light of the philosophy of Rev. Prof. Józef Tischner, with particular emphasis on its ethical and dialogical foundations. The author points out that freedom of speech cannot be understood solely as freedom of expression, but as a responsible form of communication focused on the good of others. Against the backdrop of contemporary dilemmas related to hate speech, disinformation and social polarisation, Tischner’s concept of the ethics of dialogue becomes a proposal to build a space for communication based on truth and conscience. The article uses a hermeneutic method, interpreting Tischner’s texts in the context of the philosophy of personalism, phenomenology and contemporary media challenges.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ignatianum University in Cracow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
