Feminine Subtlety or Masculine Boldness?
An Exploration of the Relationship between Watch Chains and Special Attire from the Perspective of Cultural Studies
Abstract
This article presents a verification of the common opinion that the watch chain belongs only to the world of men’s things. The issue was examined by tracing the formal and semantic relationships between these items and the gender of the wearer, the clothing worn and the profession practised. The main source for reconstructing the history of watch chains in this context was the study of selected historical objects and the analysis of source materials, descriptions from fashion magazines, mentions in memoirs, and paintings and photographs. It should be noted that the symbolic meaning of the watch chain has not yet been the subject of consistent scientific research. Due to the specific nature of the issue, the research methodology is interdisciplinary. In addition to the main strands of cultural studies and art history, which form the basis of the chosen methodology, elements from the fields of socio-cultural anthropology, anthropology of objects, sociology, heritology and memory studies were also used for this purpose. Consequently, the watch chain, primarily associated with 19th-century men’s vests, was presented as a separate item with its own history and typology. The most important conclusion from the analyses carried out is that over the centuries, the watch chain has retained a certain autonomy from changing men’s and women’s clothing – contrary to popular opinion, exceeding the framework given to it by its definition as a piece of costume jewellery. It performed various roles in culture through its ability to combine with other elements while maintaining its formal and semantic distinctiveness. It constituted an element of individual, group, class, and gender identity. However, its potential feminine or masculine character was determined by a number of factors. This object was always ready for change, responding to the changing culture and dynamics of historical events, eluding any unambiguity and categorisation.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ignatianum University in Cracow

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
