The Actuality of the Metaphor in Architectural Design
Theoretical References, Research Method and Practical Experience in Architectural Design Studio Classes
Abstract
The design process in architectural design studio’s first classes for students is often based on images that are erroneously used as references by copying some formal choices. In the most general sense, this issue is related to a gap between architectural culture and society, as architecture is considered a virtual and consumable object. Those problems could be faced with an old but still effective tool that is the metaphor. Architecture is mainly known by images, and each image has a visible and an invisible part; the latter concerns the culture that underlies it. The paper assumes the metaphor is a design tool that can be helpful in the initial stages of the design process as it allows anyone to quickly connect images, ideas, and experiences, getting deeper into the invisible part of images. Since the metaphor is mainly a linguistic agent, most of the studies concern the use of the metaphor in the field of theoretical criticism and for reviewing other projects. The paper proposes to integrate this approach by investigating the metaphor to support the transfer of shapes and figures between different architectures. Furthermore, the proposed process foresees a permanent part based on a dynamic and more mobile part where metaphorical thinking finds space. Therefore, two types of use of the metaphor are put forward: the first interprets existing buildings by recognising both linguistic metaphors used by the critics and those crystallized in the architectural form; the second instead stimulates students to use visual metaphors in determining the shape and volume of the project.
References
Biraghi Marco, Questa è architettura. Il progetto come filosofia della prassi (Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore, 2021).
Bristol Katharine, “The Pruitt – Igoe Myth”, Journal of Architectural Education 44 (1991): 163–171.
Caballero Rodriguez Rosario, “Metaphor and Genre as Cultural and Cognitive Templates in Disciplinary Acculturation: the Case of Architecture Students”, International Journal of Innovation and Leadership in the Teaching of Humanities 1 (2011): 45–63.
Caballero Rodriguez Rosario, “Metaphor and Genre as Cultural and Cognitive Templates in n disciplinary acculturation: The case of architecture students, Journal of Cognitive Semiotics V/1-2: 44–63
Caballero Rodriguez Rosario, “Metaphor and Genre: The Presence and Role of Metaphor in the Building Review, Applied Linguistic 24 (2003): 145–147. Calabrese Omar, “Le matrici culturali della semiotica dell’architettura in Italia”, Casabella 429 (1977): 19–27.
Casakin Hernan, “Metaphors as Discourse Interaction Devices in Architectural Design”, Buildings 52 (2019): 1–14.
Ciucci Giorgio, Giuseppe Terragni. Opera completa (Milano: Electa, 2003).
Colquhoun, Alan, Essays in Architectural Criticism: Modern Architecture and Historical Change (London: The Mit Press, 1981).
De Fusco Renato, Segni, storia e progetto dell’architettura (Bari: Laterza, 1989). Derrida Jacques, F. C. T. Moore “White Mythology: Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy”, New Literary History 6 (1974): 5–74.
Disciplinary Acculturation: the Case of Architecture Students”, International Journal of Innovation and Leadership in the Teaching of Humanities 1 (2011): 45–63.
Fauconnier Gilles, Turner Mark, “Blending as a central process of grammar”, in: Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, ed. Adele Goldberg (Stanford: CSLI, 1996), https://www.academia.edu/80170223/ (access: June 2023). Forty Adrian, Words and building. A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture (London: Thames and Hudson, 2000).
Franzini Elio, “Body, Symbol and Imagination”, Klesis Revue Philosophique 28 (2013): 109–128.
Franzini Elio, Fenomenologia dell’invisibile. Al di là dell’immagine (Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2001).
Garavelli Mortara Bice, Manuale di retorica (Milano: Studi Bompiani, 1988). Gargiani Roberto, Rem Koolhaas/OMA (Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2006).
Gerber Andri, Patterson Brent (Eds.), Metaphor in Architecture and Urbanism. An Introduction (Bielefeld: Transcript, 2013).
Grady Joseph, Oakley Todd, Coulson Seana, “Blending and metaphor”, in: Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Selected papers from the 5th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, eds. Raymond W. Gibbs Jr., Gerard J. Steen (Amsterdam: John Benjamins Company, 1997), 100–120. DOI: 10.1075/ cilt.175.07gra.
Guillerme Jacques, La figurazione in architettura (Milano: Franco Angeli, 1982). Heidegger Martin, “L’origine dell’opera d’arte“, in: Sentieri interrotti (Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 1968).
Hey Johnatan, Linsey Julie, Merner Alice, Agogino, Kristin, Wood Lee, “Analogies and Metaphors in Creative Design”, in: International Journal of Engineering Education 24 (2008): 283–294.
Koenig Klaus, Analisi del linguaggio architettonico (Firenze: Libreria Editrice Fiorentina, 1964).
Koolhaas Rem, Delirious New York, a retroactive manifesto for Manhattan (New York: Monacelli Press, 1994).
Lakoff George, Johnson Mark, Metaphors We Live By (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).
Lawson Bryan, How designer think. The Design process demystificated (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006).
Le Corbusier, Precisions on the Present State of Architecture and City Planning (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT press 1991), 65.
Malcovati Silvia, “Una casa è una casa, logica e tautologia nell’opera di Giorgio Grassi” in: Una casa è una casa. Scritti sul pensiero e l’opera di Giorgio Grassi, ed. Silvia Malcovati (Milano: Franco Angeli, 2011).
Martí Aris Carlos, Variations of identity. Type in Architecture, eds. Claudia Mion, Fabio Licitra (Paris: Edition Cosa Mentale, 2021).
Monestiroli Antonio, La ragione degli edifici, la scuola di Milano e oltre (Milano: Mariotti, 2010).
Monestiroli Antonio, The Metope and the Trigyph. Nine lectures on architecture (Amsterdam: Sun, 2005).
OMA, Rem Koolhaas and Bruce Mau, S, M, L, XL (New York: The Monacelli Press, 1995).
Schumacher Thomas L., Terragni’s Danteum (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2004).
Seligman Klaus, “Architecture and Language. Notes on a Metaphor”, JAE 30 (1977): 23–37.
Turner Mark, The Literary Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996). Vitruvio, Marco Pollione, De Architectura, libro I, cap. I.
Zorn Annalise, 13 Tragically Demolished Buildings that Depict Our Ever-Changing Attitudes Toward Architecture, ArchDaily, 21st June 2017, https://www. archdaily.com/873843/13-tragically-demolished-buildings-that-depictour-ever-changing-attitudes-toward-architecture (access: June 2023).
Copyright (c) 2023 Jesuit University Ignatianum in Krakow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
