A Unique Object in Mass Production
Research on So-Called Cooperative Jewelry of the Polish People’s Republic and Its Exhibitions from Private Collections
Abstract
Since around 2000, there has been a clearly noticeable interest in the design and production of Polish jewelry after 1945, popularly called jewelry of the Polish People’s Republic and treated as historic and collector’s items. This “research area” is still being explored in the context of Polish art, as evidenced by the growing number of publications – articles, monographs and exhibition catalogues. The catalogues of exhibitions organised after 2000, accompanying the exhibitions of artefacts, can be considered a kind of summary of the stages of research on jewellery of the Polish People’s Republic, but also as opening new paths of interpretation and analysis. It must be acknowledged, however, that this is still an early stage, and the research is multi-layered, beginning with findings regarding the scale of production, continuing through the findings of jewelry designers, and concluding with attempted syntheses regarding the development of jewelry design in the communist era. The text was prepared using critical analysis of scientific texts and analysis of factual data.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ignatianum University in Cracow

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
