Polish Research on Polonica in Navis Peregrinorum (1561–1695)
Abstract
This article attempts to revise the lists of Polonics compiled from the Navis peregrinorum register (1561–1695). The origins of Polish research on these lists date back to the second half of the nineteenth century. The lists were compiled by Polish Franciscans serving in the Custody of the Holy Land and by travelers visiting Jerusalem. By the time of the 2019 search, the number of Poles recorded in the book ranged from 29 to 65 names. The reasons for this discrepancy can be explained by the fact that the book’s early researchers followed various, not always precise criteria in determining a pilgrim’s „Polishness,” such as religion, the Slavic sound of the surname and the accompanying annotation „Polacco/Polacca” in Navis Peregrinorum. The pilgrims’ data was also distorted by Italian monks who latinized the data when making an entry in the book. Each researcher tried to identify the identity of the pilgrim, hence many different versions of the peregrinants names appeared. So far it has been possible to establish the personalities of only some of them.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ignatianum University in Cracow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.