Protection of the Tangible Cultural Heritage in Nicosia – Bicommunal Activities after 1974
Abstract
Cyprus has retained its rich cultural heritage, and the urban layout and architecture in Nicosia reflects the diverse history of the capital. Unresolved conflict leads to competition over cultural issues. It is, among other things, tangible heritage that has become a “victim” of the political situation and can be used to fuel disputes and enrich ethnocentric narratives. In this case, its protection may become selective. On the other hand, renovations of common places or the “Other’s” can become a symbol of reconciliation efforts. The aim of the article is to present how Cypriots protect the rich Ottoman and British cultural heritage in Nicosia. The article discusses two bi-communal projects: Nicosia Master Plan and the Technical Committee for Cultural Heritage.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ignatianum University in Cracow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
