“Warnings for Poland” by Augustyn Debole, Envoy of the Polish-Lituanian Commonwealth in St. Petersburg, in the Light of His Correspondence from the Titimes of the Great Sejm (1788–1792)
Abstract
The article presents the advice of the Polish diplomatic representative in St. Petersburg, A. Debole, addressed to the Polish elites of the time. His recommendations were intended to strengthen the supporters of reform and provide them with tools to defend these reforms against a potential Russian attack. The study is based on Debole’s extensive manuscript correspondence, analyzed in relation to the issues under discussion. The actions he suggested to the reformers – which he himself supported – proved accurate; importantly, he also anticipated Russia’s policy towards the reformed Commonwealth, clearly identifying its main goals. He warned not only against Russian aggression but also against relying too heavily on potential allies of the Polish–Lithuanian state. Debole rationally highlighted the threats to the state’s existence, while at the same time pointing to realistic ways of preventing them, showing that the Commonwealth still had a chance. His judgments and opinions, often expressed in a highly suggestive way, certainly influenced the political elite, though it remains an open question whom he persuaded to defend the May 3 Constitution and whom he convinced to pursue reforms that would prepare the state for the anticipated Russian attack. The article demonstrates that contemporaries were well aware of the dangers, and that Debole’s counsel offered clear guidance on how to avert the threat looming over his homeland.
References
O upadku konstytucyi polskiey 3go maia 1791, cz. 2, bdm.
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych
Archiwum Publiczne Potockich, rkps 192, Korespondencja A. Debolego z I. Potockim.
Zbiór Popielów, rkps 415, 420, 421, Korespondencja A. Debolego z królem.
Korespondencja polityczna Stanisława Augusta. Augustyn Deboli 1780, oprac. Ewa Zielińska, Adam Danilczyk (Warszawa: Instytut Historii PAN, 2012).
Rok nadziei i rok klęski 1791–1792. Z korespondencji Stanisława Augusta z posłem polskim w Petersburgu Augustynem Deboli, wyd. J. Łojek (Warszawa: Czytelnik, 1964).
Kalinka Walerian, Sejm Czteroletni, t. 1-2 (Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Volumen, 1991).
Łojek Jerzy, Misja Debolego w Petersburgu w latach 1787-1792. Z dziejów stosunków polsko-rosyjskich w czasach sejmu czteroletniego (Wrocław–Warszawa– Kraków: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, 1962).
Dzwonkowski Włodzimierz, „Zdrada Debolego”, Wiadomości Literackie 20 (1938): xxx.
Jerzy Michalski, „Jerzy Łojek, Misja Debolego w Petersburgu w latach 1787–1792, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich – Wydawnictwo, Wrocław–Warszawa– Kraków 1962 [rec.]”, Przegląd Historyczny 56/3 (1965).
Dzwonkowski Włodzimierz, Deboli Antoni Augustyn, w PSB, t. 5 (Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności, 1939–1946).
Łojek Jerzy, Wstęp, w Rok nadziei i rok klęski 1791–1792. Z korespondencji Stanisława Augusta z posłem polskim w Petersburgu Augustynem Deboli, wyd. J. Łojek (Warszawa: Czytelnik, 1964).
Copyright (c) 2025 Ignatianum University in Cracow

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
