Apostolic Vicar in the Midst of Conquest
The Manchu Annexation of Taiwan in Thomas Dunin Szpot’s Historiae Sinarum Imperii
Abstract
This article analyzes Tomasz Dunin Szpot’s accounts of two events in 1683: the Qing conquest of the Zheng regime in Taiwan and the accidental landing of Bishop François Pallu on the island. Although the collapse of the Zheng kingdom marked the beginning of Qing imperial rule over Taiwan, Szpot treated it only briefly and with notable inaccuracies, omitting key battles and compressing several years of developments into a simplified episode. By contrast, he devoted considerable attention to Pallu’s arrival, since it was closely connected to disputes over missionary authority and the Chinese Rites Controversy. Szpot’s narrative priorities reflected his role as a historian of Catholic missions in China rather than as an observer of Chinese political history. His perspective was shaped by Jesuit networks centered in Peking, as well as by rivalries with the Dominicans and the Paris Foreign Missions Society. In his work, Taiwan appears as a remote and marginal space “beyond the seas,” consistent with contemporary Qing geographical imagination. His maps and descriptions emphasized missionary sites rather than strategically significant maritime locations such as the Penghu Islands. This imbalance in Szpot’s narrative reveals how missionary concerns, spatial perceptions, and ecclesiastical disputes shaped early European knowledge of China, often obscuring major political transformations while foregrounding internal Church conflicts.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ignatianum University in Cracow

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
