Jesuits and Muslims in China in the account of Tomasz Dunin Szpot, S.J
Abstract
This article examines the perception of Islam and Muslims in China as presented in the historical work Historia Imperii Sinarum by the Polish Jesuit Tomasz Dunin Szpot (1644–1713). Written at the turn of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the work constitutes a synthesis of the first century of Jesuit missionary activity in China. The study places Szpot’s account within its broader historical context, particularly the political, religious, and intellectual relations between Christian Europe and the Islamic world in the early modern period. It analyses how Dunin Szpot described the origins and development of Islam in China, the role of Muslim communities in Chinese society, and their interactions with Christian missionaries. Particular attention is given to the terminology used by the author, including the distinction between religio and superstitio, as well as to the historical narratives concerning the arrival of Islam in China through Persian merchants, Muslim astronomers, and contacts with the Mongol world. The article also discusses the depiction of encounters and polemical disputations between Jesuit missionaries and Muslim scholars in Central Asia and China. By situating Dunin Szpot’s account within this wider historical framework, the study demonstrates how early modern European missionary historiography interpreted the presence of Islam in East Asia.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ignatianum University in Cracow

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
