A Conscious Choice of Sources
Tomasz Szpot Dunin on Muscovy in Inner Asia and Sino-Russian Relations in Historia Sinarum Imperii
Abstract
This article explores the sources and interpretive frameworks that shaped Tomasz Szpot Dunin’s representation of Muscovy, its position in Inner Asia, and its relations with China at the turn of the eighteenth century. It examines the missionary literature on which he relied, asking whether his account drew on earlier Catholic reports describing attempts to enter and traverse Muscovy, or whether it was based primarily on writings produced by Jesuit missionaries active in China. The study further examines the extent to which Szpot Dunin engaged with information and stereotypes circulating in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth and whether his portrayal of Muscovy aligned with Polish–Lithuanian political interests in the aftermath of the Treaty of Grzymułtowski (1686). Finally, it considers how the global aims of the Jesuit Order, including access to Muscovy and the establishment of an overland route to China may have influenced his narrative strategies. By addressing these questions, the article situates Historia Sinarum Imperii within its intellectual, political, and institutional contexts and contributes to ongoing discussions about competing loyalties to royal patrons and other networks of the early modern Jesuit order.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ignatianum University in Cracow

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
