Spaces of Memory as Visions of the Future in Spiritualist Utopias
Abstract
The paper examines selected 19th-century Spiritualist texts in the context of the relationship between the past and the future as the foundational element of spatial modelling in the examined narratives. Crucial here is the trope of memory: as cultural as well as literary models, the Spiritualist presented worlds are mnemonic constructs, grounded in the process of reminiscence as the central component of their generic framework and world-building. At the same time, in line with 19th-century euchronias, the texts in question foreground the idea of progress by transferring it from the temporary mortal existence into the everlasting realm of the hereafter, based on the continuous development of its inhabitants. In this sense, Spiritualist accounts negotiate utopia’s complex relationship with memory by postulating the need to coalesce the static cultural matrix of the collective with the dynamic memory of the individual. Thus, the spatial analysis of the selected narratives aims to demonstrate the semiotic tension between the past and the future as the cornerstone of their utopian paradigm.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ignatianum University in Cracow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
