Temporal and Spatial Dimensions in Saudade and Nostalgia
Abstract
This paper endeavors an analysis of saudade and nostalgia from the perspective of space and time categories. While there undoubtedly exist certain similarities between these concepts, including both being rooted in the deeply human experience of loss, lack and transience, as well as being directly linked to the complex inner workings of memory, they are not synonymous. Saudade, one of the foundations of the Portuguese identity, is commonly translated as “yearning” and “nostalgia,” yet several scholars, such as Correia, have suggested that what distinguishes saudade from nostalgia is the specificity of its temporal dimension. Importantly, the emotion/state of saudade is not necessarily connected with a specific place since it is the complex – and somewhat ambiguous – timeframe that underpins it. Nostalgia (from: nóstos = homecoming and álgos = pain), on the other hand, is conceptually governed by space for, as proposed by Boym, it “is a longing for a home that no longer exists or has never existed.” Hence, nostalgia is essentially intertwined with spatial, not only temporal, object of longing, which is further developed by Panico, who emphasizes the significance of the space–nostalgia relationship by observing that spaces act as triggers, stages and “spatial consolation” for nostalgic returns.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ignatianum University in Cracow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
