Spinozist Approach to Affectivity in Light of the Issue of Non-Reflective Consciousness and the Problem of Self-Knowledge
Abstract
In this paper I consider the Spinozian account of affectivity in the context of the question of primordial pre-reflective forms of self-consciousness and the problem of self-knowledge. The author presents the idea of conatus and its relation to emotion, demonstrating the heuristic potential of the Spinozian approach to the sphere of passivity. The discussion is centred on the problematic question of whether passivity gives us only a vague knowledge of ourselves, being an undesirable state, or whether the way in which affect is experienced and perceived can be relevant to selfconsciousness, constituting its primary pre-reflective form. Referring to the hermeneutics of subjectivity, the author points out that the structure of the fundamental striving to preserve one’s existence is revealed in the reflexive order as the experience of specific effort being the condition of self-consciousness. The analyses presented concerning the Spinozian conception of the striving inherent in human nature to preserve and enlarge one’s power (conatus), the operation of which is revealed, among other things, in the experience of affects, also point to considerable interpretative difficulties. Spinoza does not seem to sufficiently explain the relationship between desire, which is an expression of life, and the meaning given to it, which belongs to the order of speech.
References
Descartes René, Listy do księżniczki Elżbiety, tłum. Jerzy Kopania (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 1995).
Descartes René, Zasady filozofii, tłum. Izydora Dąmbska (Kęty: Wydawnictwo Antyk, 2001).
Goldie Peter, The Emotions. A Philosophical Exploration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
James Susan, Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).
Laertios Diogenes, Żywoty i poglądy słynnych filozofów, tłum. Irena Krońska, Kazimierz Leśniak, Witold Olszewski (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 1984).
Leibniz Gottfried Wilhelm, Zasady filozofii, czyli „monadologia”, tłum. Stanisław Cichowicz (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN 1969).
Murawska Monika, Filozofowanie z zamkniętymi oczami. Fenomenologia ciała Michela Henry’ego (Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 2011).
Nussbaum Martha, The Therapy of Desire (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).
Ricœur Paul, Philosophie de la volonté, vol. 1: Le volontaire et l’involontaire (Paris: Aubier, 1949).
Ricœur Paul, Nature and Freedom, w: idem, Political and Social Essays, red. David Stewart, Joseph Bien (Athens–Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1974).
Ricœur Paul, O sobie samym jako innym, tłum. Bogdan Chełstowski (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2003).
Spinoza Baruch, Etyka w porządku geometrycznym dowiedziona, tłum. Ignacy Myślicki (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 1954).
Warmbier Adriana, Tożsamość, narracja, hermeneutyka “siebie”: Paula Ricoeura filozofia człowieka (Kraków: Universitas, 2018).
Wigura Karolina, Wynalazek nowoczesnego serca. Filozoficzne źródła współczesnego myślenia o emocjach (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, 2019).
Legrand Dorothée, “Pre-reflective Self-as-subject from Experiential and Empirical Perspectives”, Consciousness and Cognition 16 (2007): 583–599.
Ricœur Paul, Negatywność i pierwotna afirmacja, w: idem, Podług nadziei. Odczyty, szkice, studia, wybór, oprac. i wstęp Stanisław Cichowicz, tłum. Stanisław Cichowicz i in. (Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy PAX, 1991).
Copyright (c) 2024 Ignatianum University in Cracow
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.