Jan Zamoyski, Chancellor and Grand Hetman of the Crown
His Information Channels at the Court of Moldavian Hospodar Jeremias Mohyla (1595–1605)
Abstract
As Grand Crown Hetman, Jan Zamoyski was obliged to defend the borders of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth – a task that proved particularly challenging in the southeastern frontier regions, which were continuously exposed to Tatar and Ottoman incursions. In order to effectively safeguard the Commonwealth, he had to rely on an extensive network of diplomatic contacts, which enabled him to stay informed about the evolving political and military situation along the borderlands. To this end, he sought to establish and maintain relations with successive hospodars of Moldavia and Wallachia, aiming to secure not only political allies and sources of information, but also intermediaries in dealings with the rulers of the Danubian Principalities, the Ottoman Empire, and the Crimean Khanate. Zamoyski’s 1595 military campaign led to the installation of Jeremias Mohyla – a close associate and dependent ally – on the Moldavian throne. This development allowed the hetman to establish a permanent diplomatic and intelligence outpost at the court in Suceava. The aim of this article is to examine the channels through which Jan Zamoyski obtained intelligence from the Moldavian court, and to assess their utility in his role as Grand Hetman. The analysis is based on correspondence preserved in the Zamoyski Archives (housed in the Central Archives of Historical Records in Warsaw), specifically letters addressed to Zamoyski by Jeremias Mohyla, his brother Simion Mohyla, and Łukasz Stroicz, who held the office of logothete at the Moldavian court. While the hospodar’s letters constituted a valuable source of political, diplomatic, and military intelligence for Zamoyski, the contributions of the other correspondents played a relatively minor role within his broader information network. Zamoyski also dispatched his own servants to Moldavia – individuals who officially posed as buyers for the Zamoyski estate, but in fact served key functions within the hetman’s intelligence network.
References
Archiwum Główne Akt Dawnych, Archiwum Zamoyskich, sygn. 8, 150, 152, 207, 682, 697, 818, 819, 857, 867, 2776, 3028.
Documente privitoare la istoria Românilor, E. Hurmuzaki, supl. 2, t. 1: 1510–1600, red. Ioan Bogdan (Bucureşti: Stabilimentul Grafic I. V. Socecu, 1893).
Documente privitoare la istoria Românilor, E. Hurmuzaki, supl. 2, t. 2: 1601–1640, red. Ioan Bogdan (Bucureşti: Stabilimentul Grafic I. V. Socecu, 1895).
Jasnowski Józef, „Dwie relacje z wyprawy Zamoyskiego pod Cecorę w r. 1595”, Przegląd Historyczno-Wojskowy 10/2 (1938): 240–250.
Rajnolda Hejdensztejna sekretarza królewskiego, Dzieje Polski od śmierci Zygmunta Augusta do roku 1594. Ksiąg XII, 2, red. Michał Gliszczyński, Włodzimierz Spasowicz (Petersburg: Wolff Bolesław Maurycy, 1857).
Bazylow Ludwik, Siedmiogród a Polska 1576–1613 (Warszawa: PWN, 1967).
Gawron Przemysław, Hetman koronny w systemie ustrojowym Rzeczypospolitej w latach 1581–1646 (Warszawa: Neriton, 2010).
Grzybowski Stanisław, Jan Zamoyski (Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 1994).
Horn Ildikó, Andrzej Batory (Warszawa: Neriton, 2010).
Kowalczyk Jerzy, Kultura i ideologia Jana Zamoyskiego (Warszawa: Instytut Sztuki PAN, Muzeum Zamojskie, 2005).
Milewski Dariusz, Polsko-mołdawskie stosunki polityczno-wojskowe w latach 1538–1595 (Oświęcim: Napoleon V, 2022).
Śliwiński Artur, Jan Zamoyski. Kanclerz i hetman wielki koronny (Warszawa: Trzaska, Evert i Michalski, 1947).
Bobicescu Cristian A., „Jeremi Mohyła – między Zygmuntem III a kanclerzem i hetmanem wielkim koronnym Janem Zamoyskim (1591–1603). Uwagi wstępne”, Kronika Zamkowa. Roczniki 7/73 (2020): 19–34.
Bobicescu Cristian A., „Recepcja ustroju polsko-litewskiego w Mołdawii Mohyłów (1595–1611)”, cz. 1, Saeculum Christianum 29/2 (2022): 126–138.
Bobicescu Cristian A., „Tyranny and Colonization. Preliminary Considerations about the Colonization Plans of Moldavia during the Time of Jan Zamoyski”, Revue des études sud-est européennes 54/1-4 (2016): 99–118.
Czamańska Ilona, „Czy naprawdę były to awantury? Interwencje polskie w Mołdawii w latach 1595–1616”, Balcanica Posnaniensia. Acta et studia 28/2 (2021): 57–79.
Czamańska Ilona, „Caraterul legaturilor lui Jan Zamoyski cu Movilestii”, Arhiva Genealogica 3(9)/3-4 (1996): 307–312.
Milewski Dariusz, „A Campaign of the Great Hetman Jan Zamoyski in Moldavia (1595). Part I. Politico-diplomatic and Military Preliminaries”, Codrul Cosminului 18/2 (2012): 261–286.
Milewski Dariusz, „A Campaign of the Great Hetman Jan Zamoyski in Moldavia (1595). Part II. The Battle of Ţuţora and Aftermath”, Codrul Cosminului 19/1 (2013): 57–76.
Milewski Dariusz, „Między patronatem a współpracą – relacje Jana Zamoyskiego i hospodara mołdawskiego Jeremiego Mohyły (1595–1605)”, Wieki Stare i Nowe (2012): 11–31.
Wasiucionek Michał, „Kanclerz i hospodar – klientelizm nietypowy? Na marginesie stosunków Jana Zamoyskiego z Jeremim Mohyłą”, Wschodni Rocznik Humanistyczny 6 (2009): 65–72.
Bobicescu Cristian A., „Unia, inkorporacja czy lenno? Kilka uwag o stosunkach Mołdawii z Rzecząpospolitą podczas panowania Jeremiego Mohiły (1595– 1606)”, w Rzeczpospolita w XVI–XVII wieku. Państwo czy wspólnota?, red. Bogusław Dybaś, Tomasz Kempa, Paweł Hanczewski (Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK, 2007), 219–239.
Gawron Przemysław, „Jan Zamoyski, kanclerz i hetman wielki koronny, wobec zmagań turecko-habsburskich w latach 1593-1605/6”, w Polska wobec wielkich konfliktów w Europie nowożytnej. Z dziejów dyplomacji i stosunków międzynarodowych w XV–XVIII wieku, red. Ryszard Skowron (Kraków: Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego „Societas Vistulana”, 2009), 23–47. Milewski Dariusz, „Kość niezgody. Mołdawia podczas wojny polsko-osmańskiej 1620–1621”, w Od Cecory do Chocimia. Studia z dziejów wojny Rzeczypospolitej z Turcją 1620–1621, red. Zbigniew Hundert, Paweł Tyszka (Warszawa: Zamek Królewski w Warszawie – Muzeum, 2024), 13–35.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ignatianum University in Cracow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
