The Professionalism of British Diplomats Sent to the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth in the First Half of the 18th Century
Abstract
This article addresses the professionalism of British diplomats accredited at the Dresden-Warsaw court of the Wettins in the first half of the 18th century. The analysis focuses on the qualifications, competencies, and professional practices of British envoys against the backdrop of contemporary political and diplomatic relations between Great Britain and the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. Based on the examination of archival materials, including correspondence and diplomatic reports, it appears that most diplomats possessed a classical education and a good command of foreign languages. However, their limited proficiency in Polish and lack of a thorough understanding of local cultural and political conditions constrained their ability to interact effectively with local elites and led to stereotypical and oversimplified interpretations of the political situation in the Commonwealth. Despite these shortcomings, these diplomats leveraged the prestige of Great Britain to build political and social contacts. Although their real influence on internal events in the Commonwealth remained limited, they played a significant role as observers and reliable sources of information for the British government.
References
The National Archives (London), Foreign Office, King’s Letter Books 90/46. The National Archives (London), State Papers Domestic, George II 36/5.
The National Archives (London), State Papers Foreign, Entry Books 104/121, 104/209, 104/214.
The National Archives (London), State Papers Foreign, Poland and Saxony SP 88/17, SP 88/18, 88/20, SP 88/22, 88/23, SP 88/24, SP 88/25, SP 88/28, 88/32, 88/35, 88/37, SP 88/38, SP 88/41, SP 88/51.
The National Archives (London), State Papers Foreign, Sweden 95/15.
Calendar of Treasury Books, vol. 29: 1714–1715, red. William A. Shaw, F.H. Slingsby (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1957).
Callières Francois de, The Art of Diplomacy, red. Maurice A. Keens-Soper, Karl W. Schweizer (New York: Leicester University Press-Holmes and Meier, 1983).
Letters and Correspondence, Public and Private, of the Right Honorable Henry St. John, Lord Visc. Bolingbroke; during the Time He was Secretary of State to Queen Anne, Vol. 1, red. Gilbert Parke (London: G. G. and J. Robinson, 1798). Report on the Manuscripts of Lord Polwarth, Preserved at Mertoun House, Berwickshire, Vol. 1-2 (London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1911, 1916).
Åström Sven-Erik, From Stockholm to St. Petersburg. Commercial Factors in the Political Relations between England and Sweden, 1675–1700 (Helsinki: Finnish Historical Society, 1962).
Black Jeremy, British Diplomats and Diplomacy, 1660–1800 (Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2001).
Graham John Murray, Annals and Correspondence of the Viscount and the First and Second Earls of Stair, vol. 1 (Edinburgh–London: William Blackwood and Sons, 1875).
Hanczewski Paweł, Dyplomacja brytyjska w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej w latach 1748–1756. Misje w Berlinie, Dreźnie, Petersburgu i Wiedniu (Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, 2001).
Hartley Janet M., Charles Whitworth. Diplomat in the Age of Peter the Great (London–New York: Routledge, 2002).
Horn David Bayne, British Diplomatic Representatives, 1689–1789 (London: Royal Historical Society, 1932).
Horn David Bayne, The British diplomatic service, 1689–1789 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961).
The House of Commons, 1690–1715, Vol. 5: Members O–Z, red. Eveline Cruickshanks, Stuart Handley, David W. Hayton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
Krysztopa-Czupryńska Barbara, Rzeczpospolita w oczach dyplomatów brytyjskich w pierwszej połowie XVIII wieku (Olsztyn: Polskie Towarzystwo Historyczne Oddział w Olsztynie, 2013).
Lewis George Cornewall, Essays on the administrations of Great Britain from 1783 to 1830, red. Edmund Head (London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts, & Green, 1864).
Namier Lewis, Brooke John, The House of Commons, 1754–1790, vol. 3: Members K–Y (London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1964).
Przezdziecki Renaud, Diplomatic ventures and adventures. Some experiences of British Envoys at the Court of Poland (London: Polish Research Centre, 1953).
Roosen William James, The Age of Louis XIV. The Rise of Modern Diplomacy (Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Co., 1976).
Thompson Andrew C., Britain, Hanover and the Protestant Interest, 1688–1756 (Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 2006).
Thuillier Guy, La première école d’administration: l’Académie politique de Louis XIV (Genève: Librairie DROZ S.A., 1996).
Horn David Bayne, “The Cost of the Diplomatic Service, 1747–52”, The English Historical Review 43/172 (1928): 606–611.
Milne June, “The Diplomacy of Dr. John Robinson at the Court of Charles XII of Sweden, 1697–1709”, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 30 (1948): 75–93.
Sałkiewicz-Munnerlyn Ewa, „Historia Nuncjatury Apostolskiej w Polsce i rola nuncjusza w dyplomacji”, Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica 23 (2019): 164–174.
Schweizer Karl, “Scotsmen and the British Diplomatic Service, 1714–1789”, International Review of Scottish Studies 8 (1978): 115–136.
Anusik Zbigniew, „Problemy życia codziennego na placówce dyplomatycznej w końcu XVIII wieku”, w Między Barokiem a Oświeceniem. Radości i troski dnia codziennego, red. Stanisław Achremczyk (Olsztyn: Ośrodek Badań Naukowych im. Wojciecha Kętrzyńskiego, 2006), 103–121.
Chomicki Grzegorz, „Dole i niedole brytyjskiego dyplomaty. O karierze Jamesa Scotta i jego misjach w Saksonii, Rzeczypospolitej i Gdańsku”, w Gospodarka, społeczeństwo, kultura w dziejach nowożytnych. Studia ofiarowane Pani Profesor Marii Boguckiej, red. Andrzej Karpiński, Edward Opaliński, Tomasz Wiślicz (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo DiG, 2010), 61–80.
Chomicki Grzegorz, „Dyplomacja brytyjska wobec problemów politycznych Rzeczypospolitej (od wstąpienia na tron Jerzego I do zawarcia pokoju w Nystadt)”, w Rzeczpospolita w dobie wielkiej wojny północnej, red. Jadwiga Muszyńska (Kielce: Wydawnictwo Akademii Świętokrzyskiej 2001), 167–184.
Courtney William Prideaux, “Schaub, Sir Luke”, w Dictionary of National Biography, vol. 50: Russen – Scobell, red. Sidney Lee (London: Smith, Elder, & Co., 1897), 412–413.
Krysztopa-Czupryńska Barbara, „Rzeczpospolita w wielkiej wojnie północnej w świetle relacji Johna Robinsona (1703–1707)”, w Polska wobec wielkich konfliktów w Europie. Z dziejów dyplomacji i stosunków międzynarodowych w XV–XVIII wieku, red. Ryszard Skowron (Kraków: Societas Vistulana, 2009), 91–108.
Newman Aubrey, “Two Countries, one Monarch. The Union England/Hanover as the Ruler’s personal Problem”, w Die Personalunionen von Sachsen-Polen 1697–1763 und Hannover-England 1714–1837. Ein Vergleich, red. Rex Rexheuser (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2005), 353–368.
Norgate Gerald le Grys, “Robinson, Thomas”, w Dictionary of National Biography, vol. 49: Robinson – Russell, red. Sidney Lee (London: Smith, Elder, & Co., 1897), 47–49.
Scott Hamish M., “Prussia’s Royal Foreign Minister: Frederick the Great and the Administration of Prussian Diplomacy”, w Royal and Republican Sovereignty in Early Modern Europe. Essays in Memory of Ragnhild Hatton, eds. Robert Oresko, G.C. Gibbs, Hamish M. Scott (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 500–526.
Simms Brendan, “Hanover in British Policy 1714–1783. Interests and Aims of the Protagonists”, w Die Personalunionen von Sachsen-Polen 1697–1763 und Hannover-England 1714–1837. Ein Vergleich, red. Rex Rexheuser (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2005), 311–334.
Stephens Henry Morse, “Dalrymple, John”, w Dictionary of National Biography, vol. 13: Craik – Damer, red. Leslie Stephen (London: Smith, Elder, & Co., 1888), 420–423.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ignatianum University in Cracow

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
