“The Courage of the Citizen” (πολιτικὴ ἀνδρεία) in Sixteenth-Century Polish Thought
Abstract
The article considers the issue of the presence of the concept of civic courage (πολιτικὴ ἀνδρεία) in Old Polish political thought, particularly during the sixteenth century. This term originated in classical (Aristotle, Plato, Cicero, the Stoics) and Christian philosophy (St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas) and was discussed within the broader context of the virtue of courage. In classical thought, a distinction was introduced between martial courage and the courage of peacetime, the latter being associated with participation in political life. The article argues that classical and Christian reflections on “civic courage” were adopted in Old Polish discourse, though they were closely tied to the issue of decisionmaking processes. In the writings of Frycz Modrzewski and other thinkers (as well as in Jan Kochanowski’s Odprawa posłów greckich [The Dismissal of the Greek Envoys], this theme is intriguingly linked with the problem of individual resistance against the majority. The article also points to a crystallizing understanding of citizenship in political practice as a form of “opposition”– particularly evident in the treatise Krótkie zebranie rzeczy potrzebnych z strony wolności [A Brief Summary of Matters Essential to Liberty], as well as in reflections associated with the Sandomierz Rebellion. Finally, the question is posed whether the institution of liberum veto was ever connected with the concept of “civic courage.” The article suggests that these issues were most likely not associated with one another.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ignatianum University in Cracow

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
