Interpersonal closeness as a pedagogical category fostering the integration of educational environments: families and schools

Keywords: interpersonal closeness, educational environment, family, school, integration

Abstract

Research objectives (aims) and problem(s): The aim of this article is to examine the phenomenon of interpersonal closeness in relation to family–school cooperation. The author defines interpersonal closeness as a pedagogical category and discusses the unifying role of the pedagogy of interpersonal closeness in cooperation between educational environments. The following research questions were posed: What characterizes interpersonal closeness understood as a pedagogical category? What is the unifying role of interpersonal closeness in family–school cooperation?

Research methods: The article takes a theoretical, review-based approach, employing methods such as analysis of scientific literature and examination of existing data.

Process of argumentation: The author explores the phenomenon of interpersonal closeness, beginning with etymological analyses and references to other scientific fields. He presents interpersonal closeness as a pedagogical category, defines it, and characterizes the pedagogy of closeness. The author draws attention to family and school as educational environments in which closeness can be developed. He emphasizes the importance of cooperation between these environments and the role of interpersonal closeness in strengthening that cooperation.

Research findings and their impact on the development of educational sciences: The author draws attention to the relatively underexamined phenomenon of interpersonal closeness. The analyses support the thesis that interpersonal closeness can be treated as a pedagogical category of great importance for the development of all participants in the educational process and for their cooperation. The results indicate a need for a pedagogy of closeness, as it can guide both the building of interpersonal relationships and the overcoming of difficulties that arise in this process. The author provides pedagogical implications that are relevant to the development of interpersonal closeness in the family–school relationship.

Conclusions and/or recommendations: Referring to the pedagogical category of closeness may constitute a key to interpreting situations that occur in the family–school relationship. The analysis may serve as a basis for further discussion on the place and significance of closeness in education.

References

Ainsworth, M. D., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127388

Barnat, D. (2009). Indywidualizm w filozofii społecznej Charlesa Taylora [Individualism in Charles Taylor’s social philosophy]. Diametros, 20, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.20.2009.342

Błasiak, A. (2024). Problems of reversed roles in the family: Necessary knowledge of the teacher and measures to help parentalized students. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education, 13(2(26), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2024.1326/13

Bowlby, J. (1983). Attachment. Basic Books.

Brzezińska, A. I. (2008). Nauczyciel jako organizator społecznego środowiska uczenia się [The teacher as an organizer of the social learning environment]. In E. Filipiak (Ed.), Rozwijanie zdolności uczenia się. Wybrane konteksty i problemy [Development of learning abilities. Selected contexts and problems] (pp. 35–50). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego.

Długosz-Kurczabowa, K. (2008). Wielki słownik etymologiczno-historyczny języka polskiego [The great etymological and historical dictionary of the Polish language]. PWN.

Durkin, J., Jackson, D., & Usher, K. (2021). Touch in times of COVID-19: Touch hunger hurts. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(1–2), e4-e5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15488

Dwiningtyas, Q. C., & Hajaroh, M. (2023). The influence of the family environment on teacher performance through teacher competence as mediator variable. In R. Perdana, S. Sunyono, G. E. Putrawan, T. Y. Septiawan, & B. Saputra (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Progressive Education 2022 (ICOPE 2022) (pp. 529–543). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-060-2_49

Frejusz, K. (2021). Obecność jako metakategoria pedagogiczna [Presence as a pedagogical metacategory]. In B. Majerek & A. Domagała-Kręcioch (Eds.), Kategorie (nie)obecne w edukacji. Wychowanie – kształcenie – rozwój (pp. 33–45). Impuls.

Gałęska, U. (2015). Przeobrażenia więzi rodzinno-społecznych w rodzinie XXI wieku [Transformations of the family – social bond in the 21st century family]. Wychowanie w Rodzinie, 11, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.23734/wwr20151.027.041

Godawa, G. (2020). Znaczenie dotyku w edukacji. Model węgierski [The meaning of touch in education. The Hungarian model]. In A. Kamińska & P. Oleśniewicz (Eds.), Edukacja jutra. Zróżnicowane obszary rozwoju edukacji instytucjonalnej [Education of tomorrow: Diverse areas of institutional education development] (pp. 117–129). Wydawnictwo Akademii Sztuki Wojennej.

Godawa, G. (2023). Pedagogia bliskości międzyludzkiej [Pedagogy of interpersonal closeness]. Impuls.

Górniewicz, J. (2001). Kategorie pedagogiczne [Pedagogical categories]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego.

Hejnicka-Bezwińska, T. (2008). Pedagogika ogólna [General pedagogy]. Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.

Ibragimov, G. I., Murkshtis, M., Zaitseva, N. A., Kosheleva, Y. P., Sadykova, A. R., & Shindryaeva, N. N. (2023). Research trends on learning environment in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), em2351. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13680

Janke, A. (2017). Wychowanie rodzinne [Family upbringing]. In M. Marczewski, R. Gawrych, D. Opozda, T. Sakowicz, & P. Skrzydlewski (Eds.), Pedagogika rodziny. Podejście systemowe. T. 2: Wychowanie rodzinne [Family pedagogy: A systemic approach. Vol 2: Family upbringing] (pp. 463–534). Wyższa Szkoła Społeczno-Ekonomiczna.

Jaszczyszyn, E., & Cichocki, A. (2015). Teacher’s competences – Prospects for development and professional training. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education, 4(1)7). Retrieved December 9, 2024, from https://czasopisma.ignatianum.edu.pl/jpe/article/view/1124

Kawula, S. (2001). Pedagogika społeczna, dokonania – aktualność – perspektywy [Social pedagogy. Achievements – relevance – perspectives]. Adam Marszałek.

Kazubowska, U. (2020). Awareness of parents on the example of the functioning of professional foster families in Szczecin. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 4, 254–267. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol4.4983

Kluczyńska, J. (2024). Between school and family environment. Tasks of a school social worker in the contemporary educational system in Poland. Studia z Teorii Wychowania, XV(2 (47)), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.6574

Konieczna, A. (2019). „Nasza klasa”. Społeczne zachowania przestrzenne i reguły dystansu w społeczności klas szkolnych [“Our classroom”. Social spatial behavior and distance rules in a school classroom community]. Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. M. Grzegorzewskiej.

Lévinas, E. (1999). Czas i to, co inne [Time and the other] (J. Migasiński, Trans). Wydawnictwo KR. (Original work published 1987)

Malik, R. H., & Rizvi, A. A. (2018). Effect of classroom learning environment on students’ academic achievement in mathematics at secondary level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(2), 207–218.

Manjarres Zambrano, N. V., Calle Cabezas, R. E., Escobar Medina, G. E., Carrera Salinas, K. J., & Gavilanes Gavilanes, W. F. (2023). Literature review on the family environment in school performance. Universidad Ciencia Y Tecnología, 27(118), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.47460/uct.v27i118.688

Okoń, W. (2004). Nowy Słownik Pedagogiczny [The new pedagogical dictionary]. Żak.

Online Etymology Dictionary. (n.d.). Close. In Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved November 28, 2024, from https://www.etymonline.com/word/close

Przecławska, A. (2009). Przedmowa [Foreword]. In E. Marynowicz-Hetka (Ed.), Pedagogika Społeczna. Podręcznik akademicki [Social pedagogy: An academic textbook] (Vol. 2, pp. 15–18). PWN.

Ricoeur, P. (1984). Proces metaforyczny jako poznanie, wyobrażenie i odczuwanie [The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and feeling]. Pamiętnik Literacki: czasopismo kwartalne poświęcone historii i krytyce literatury polskiej, 75(2), 269–286.

Rozenbajgier, M. (2019). Wprowadzenie [Introduction]. In M. Rozenbajgier (Ed.), Środowiska wychowawcze. Wybrane zagadnienia [Educational environments. Selected issues] (pp. 7–9). Petrus.

Rozporządzenie Ministra Edukacji Narodowej z dnia 14 lutego 2017 r. w sprawie podstawowych kierunków realizacji polityki oświatowej państwa oraz wymagań wobec szkół i placówek (Dz.U. z 2017 r. poz. 356) [Regulation of the Minister of National Education of 14 February 2017 on the Fundamental Directions for the Implementation of the State’s Educational Policy and the Requirements for Schools and Educational Institutions (Journal of Laws of 2017, item 356)].

Samita, Ms. (2021). A study on the influence of family environment on secondary school students. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 2(9), 985–989.

Sikorski, J. (2013). Wybrane czynniki środowiska rodzinnego warunkujące przebieg edukacji szkolnej dziecka z niepełnosprawnością intelektualną [The factors of family environment conditioning education of children with intellectual disabilities]. Rocznik Komisji Nauk Pedagogicznych, 66, 159–172.

Solaris, I. (2022). School-Family cooperation: creation of a new institution. International Journal of Latest Research in Humanities and Social Science (IJLRHSS), 05(10), 31–36. DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.21431595.v1

Mikler-Chwastek, A. (2024). Trudności w organizacji współpracy między nauczycielami a rodzicami uczniów – sprawozdanie z badań [Difficulties in organizing collaboration between teachers and students’ parents – A research report]. Kultura i Wychowanie, 1/17, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.25312/2083-2923.17/2020_08amc

van der Wal, R. C., Litzellachner, L. F., Karremans, J. C., Buiter, N., Breukel, J., & Maio, G. R. (2024). Values in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(7), 1066–1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231156975

Waloszek, D. (2014). Zapomniane (?) inspiracje dla wychowania [Forgotten (?) educational inspirations]. Labor et Educatio, 2, 221–246.

Wanat, C. L. (2010). Challenges balancing collaboration and independence in home-school relationships: Analysis of parents’ perceptions in one district. School Community Journal, 20(1), 159–186.

Żywczok, A. (2013). Hermeneutyka uczuciowej i duchowej bliskości [Hermeneutics of emotional and spiritual closeness]. In A. Żywczok (Ed.), Miłość – akt preferencji duchowości człowieka. Studium bliskości duchowej [Love – an act of preference for human spirituality. A study of spiritual closeness] (pp. 21–35). Żak.

Published
2025-12-31
How to Cite
Godawa, G. (2025). Interpersonal closeness as a pedagogical category fostering the integration of educational environments: families and schools. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education, 14(2 (28), 273-288. https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2025.1428.15