Critical thinking in teacCritical thinking in teachers’ perception: Critical remarks based on researchhers' perception/understanding. Critical remarks on the basis of research

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2025.1428.24
Keywords: critical thinking competence, educational management, teachers’ perception of critical thinking, self-management, educational challenges in the information society

Abstract

Research objectives (aims) and problem(s): This study investigates teachers’ perceptions of critical thinking (CT) as an essential competence in contemporary education. It examines teachers’ self-assessed levels of CT, their preparedness to develop CT in students, and the barriers that hinder its effective implementation in teaching practice.

Research methods: A quantitative survey was conducted among 213 teachers from various educational levels in southern Poland. The structured questionnaire included self-assessment items and Likert-scale questions measuring teachers’ attitudes toward CT. Data analysis employed descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and nonparametric tests (Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis).

Structure of the article: The article begins with a conceptual overview of CT in the context of the information society, followed by a description of the research methodology. Subsequent sections present and discuss the empirical findings and their implications for educational practice.

Research findings and their impact on the development of educational sciences: Teachers highly value CT but often feel underprepared to teach it. Only 7.5% reported being very well prepared, and many cited obstacles such as a lack of methodological tools, insufficient training, and low student motivation. The results emphasize the need for systematic support and teacher education focused on CT instruction.

Conclusions: The study underscores the importance of professional development that enhances teachers’ competence and confidence in fostering CT. Strengthening CT-oriented curricula and training programs is vital for preparing students to think critically in a complex, information-driven world.

References

Ab Kadir, M. A. (2018). An inquiry into critical thinking in the Australian curriculum: Examining its conceptual understandings and their implications on developing critical thinking as a “general capability” on teachers’ practice and knowledge. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(4), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1535424

Aliakbari, M., & Sadeghdaghighi, A. (2013). Teachers' perception of the barriers to critical thinking. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.031

Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching critical thinking skills: Literature review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 21–39.

Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching critical thinking skills in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 8(2), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v8i2.3554

Brookfield, S. D. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. Jossey-Bass.

Cáceres, M., Nussbaum, M., & Ortiz, J. (2020). Integrating critical thinking into the classroom: A teacher’s perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, Article 100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100674

Choy, S. C., & Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its integration in the classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 198–206.

Colomer, J., Cañabate, D., Stanikuniene, B., & Bubnys, R. (2021). Formulating modes of cooperative learning for education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 13, Article 3465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063465

Costa, A. L. (2001). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D.C. Heath & Co.

Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17, 160–166.

Enabulele, A. (2011). Critical thinking in secondary language arts: Teacher perceptions and relevant strategies. Online Submission.

Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report. American Philosophical Association.

Glaser, E. M. (1941). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. Teachers College, Columbia University.

Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449

Halpern, D. F. (2007). Halpern critical thinking assessment using everyday situations: Background and scoring standards. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Halpern, D. F. (2013). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.

Halpern, D. F. (2014). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A brief edition of Thought and Knowledge. Routledge.

Krotz, F. (2007). The meta-process of “mediatization” as a conceptual framework. Global Media and Communication, 3(3), 256–260.

Laabidi, Y., & Laabidi, H. (2023). The relationship between teachers' level of use of critical thinking and their attitudes. TRANS-KATA: Journal of Language, Literature, Culture, and Education, 4(1), 176–190.

Liu, W. (2023). Critical thinking skills for Chinese teachers: A study of mathematics teachers’ perceptions. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 7(2), 1–16.

Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17, 160–166.

Lombardi, L., Mednick, F., Backer, F., & Lombaerts, K. (2022). Teachers' perceptions of critical thinking in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 15, 1–16.

Łukasik, J. (2016). Rozwój osobisty studentów pedagogiki [Personal development of pedagogy students]. Edukacja Ustawiczna Dorosłych, 3(94), 120–129.

McLuhan, M. (2004). Understanding media: Extensions of man. Science and Technology Publishing.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Pearson Education.

Phillips, N. H. (2023). Developing critical thinking in classrooms: Teacher responses to a Reading-for-Meaning workshop. Reading & Writing, 14(1).

Rieckmann, M. (2012). The global perspective of education for sustainable development: A European–Latin American dialogue about key competencies for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 18(6), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.697547

Rothstein, R., Wilder, T., & Jacobsen, R. (2007). Balance in the balance. Educational Leadership, 52(8), 8–14.

Sainn, G., & Ugwuegbu, D. C. E. (1980). Educational psychology in a changing world. Unwin Hyman.

Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (1987). Critical thinking as defined by the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking and Educational Reform.

van Dijk, J. (2020). The network society. Sage Publications.

Yasir, A., & Alnoori, B. (2020). Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education. International Journal of Research in Science and Technology, 10, Article 10.37648/ijrst.v10i04.002.

Published
2025-12-31
How to Cite
Mróz, A., Twardosz, N., Zsigmond, I., & Wiatrowska, A. (2025). Critical thinking in teacCritical thinking in teachers’ perception: Critical remarks based on researchhers’ perception/understanding. Critical remarks on the basis of research. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education, 14(2 (28), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2025.1428.24
Issue
Vol. 14 No. 2 (28) (2025): Family and School: Educational Partnership
Section
Miscellaneous Articles

Copyright (c) 2025 Anna Mróz, Natalia Twardosz, Istvan Zsigmond, Anna Wiatrowska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  1. The Author/Authors declares/declare that their publication is original has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere and does not include borrowings from other works which might cause Publisher's responsibility, does not infringe the rights of the third party and that their copyright on this publication is not limited. The Author/Authors will incur all the costs and will pay compensations which might result from the mendacity of the following statement.

  2. The Author/Authors declares/declare that issues about publication ethics, have been appropriately considered.

  3. The Author/Authors agrees/agree to publish the article free of charge in Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education in English or Spanish. The Editorial Board reserves the right to shorten the texts and change the titles.

  4. As part of free publication mentioned in § 1, the Author/Authors agrees/agree to make the full electronic version of their article available in the Internet.

  5. The Author/Authors agrees/agree to index their article in databases at home and abroad, including abstracts and keywords as well as Authors’ affiliation in English and in other languages. The Author/Authors agrees/agree to pass on the information mentioned above to the owners of these databases.

  6. The Author/Authors declares/declare that the article is free of plagiarism.

  7. The Author/Authors declares/declare that funding and conflict of interest information has been included in the article.

  8. The Author/Authors accepts/accept that the author is aware of the consequences of scientific dishonesty, which, once detected, will be documented and disclosed to the public, and information about it will be communicated to the relevant institutions (universities employing the authors, scientific societies, publishing houses, etc.).

  9. The Author/Authors declares/declare to publish the text in the Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0).

  10. For one Author. Please complete the Author Statement and send it to the editorial office. Please download, complete, scan and attach the file in the system during the submission process.
    Download: Author Statement

  11. For more than one Author. The Authors declare to bear complete responsibility for the scientific reliability of the article submitted. The detailed contribution of all co-authors is defined. Please complete the Authors Statement-Authorship Contributions and send it to the editorial office. Please indicate the specific contributions made by each author (list the authors’ initials, e.g., JKH).  Please download, complete, scan and attach the file in the system during the submission process. 
    Download: Authors Statement - Authorship Contributions