From problem to mystery. How to approach family as a partner in education?
Abstract
Research objectives (aims) and problem(s): In current studies on the educational triangle of school, family, and local community, the distinct character of the family is generally assumed rather than explicitly articulated or critically examined. This study aims to fill this gap as a contribution to dealing with the difficulties of cooperation within the educational triangle.
Research methods: This study employs a critical cultural-philosophical analysis of contemporary tendencies in how families are approached in Western societies. This analysis clarifies the main trends in recent studies in pedagogy and educational sciences on educational partnerships between school and family. An investigation of personalist philosophical understandings of family is used to develop an alternative to current dominant views.
Process of argumentation: First, the research problem is defined by analyzing how recent pedagogical studies on the educational triangle approach family. Second, the problem is placed in a broader perspective of current social tendencies in viewing the family: either with suspicion or appreciation. Third, the reasons for this dual evaluation are discussed and shown to lead to an impasse: the family is expected to be both opened up and protected and is often instrumentalized, while its specific character remains assumed rather than clarified. Fourth, an alternative approach is explored through the personalist philosophical perspectives on family offered by Gabriel Marcel and Jean Lacroix. They distinguish between approaching the family as “problem” and as “mystery.” The conclusion indicates the value of the mystery approach for addressing the risks inherent in the current impasse regarding how to deal with family, including as a partner of schools.
Research findings and their impact on the development of educational sciences: The impact of the findings on educational sciences is presented in relation to four acute risks arising from the impasse, which are also relevant in school–family relations:
- The risk of overlooking the family’s distinct character.
- The risk of asking too much of the family.
- The risk of judging the family.
- The risk of overly negative, one-sided evaluations of the family’s strong influence.
Conclusions and/or recommendations: The findings lead to the following recommendations:
- In schools’ interactions with families, the unnamable distinctiveness of the family must be respected.
- To prevent the erosion of the family through excessive external demands, families must be granted adequate non-instrumental space to develop and sustain their own specific identity
- This distinctiveness should be protected through restraint in judging whether a family is “good.”
- This also requires restraint in intervening in families from the outside.
References
Bréchon, P. (1976). La famille: Idées traditionnelles et idées nouvelles. Éditions du Centurion. https://classiques.uqam.ca/contemporains/brechon_pierre/famille_idees/la_famille_avant_propos.html
De Jong, G., & Schout, G. (2013). Researching the applicability of family group conferencing in public mental health care. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 796–802.
Doolan, M. (2012). Youth policy in the Netherlands: Making provision for the voice of families. In R. Clarijs & Th. Malmberg (Eds.), The quiet revolution: Aggrandising people power by family group conferences (pp. 11–24). SWP Publishers.
Epstein, J. L. (2010). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(3), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200326
Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., VanVoorhis, F. L., Martin, C. S., Thomas, B. G., & Greenfield, M. D. (2019). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (4th ed.). Corwin Press.
Greenwalt, K. (2021). Theorizing the “home” in homeschooling: Pragmatist analyses of the family, education, and civic belonging. Educational Theory, 71(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12486
Johnson, L. (2015). Rethinking parental involvement: A critical review of the literature. Urban Education Research & Policy Annuals, 3(1). https://journals.charlotte.edu/urbaned/article/view/354
Kroeger, J. (2019). School-community partnerships for inclusion(s) of LGBTQI youth and families. In S. B. Sheldon & T. Turner-Vorbeck (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of family, school, and community relationships in education (pp. 117–138). Wiley-Blackwell.
Lacroix, J. (1948). Force et faiblesses de la famille. Éditions du Seuil.
Marcel, G. (2010). The mystery of the family: The creative vow as essence of fatherhood. In Homo viator: Introduction to the metaphysic of hope (E. Craufurd & P. Seaton, Trans., pp. 62–117). Graham.
Marsh, P., & Crow, G. (1998). Family group conferences in child welfare. Wiley-Blackwell.
Pennell, J. (2006). Restorative practices and child welfare: Toward an inclusive civil society. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 259–279.
Schaafsma, P. (2023). Family and Christian ethics. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/family-and-christian-ethics/5C2FBA126FDFD150AE201254E8897402
Sheldon, S. B., & Turner-Vorbeck, T. (2019). The Wiley handbook of family, school, and community relationships in education. Wiley-Blackwell.
Swindler Boutte, G., & Johnson, G. L., Jr. (2021). Community and family involvement in urban schools. In H. R. Milner & K. Lomotey (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 167–187). Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2025 Petruschka Schaafsma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
The Author/Authors declares/declare that their publication is original has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere and does not include borrowings from other works which might cause Publisher's responsibility, does not infringe the rights of the third party and that their copyright on this publication is not limited. The Author/Authors will incur all the costs and will pay compensations which might result from the mendacity of the following statement.
-
The Author/Authors declares/declare that issues about publication ethics, have been appropriately considered.
-
The Author/Authors agrees/agree to publish the article free of charge in Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education in English or Spanish. The Editorial Board reserves the right to shorten the texts and change the titles.
-
As part of free publication mentioned in § 1, the Author/Authors agrees/agree to make the full electronic version of their article available in the Internet.
- The Author/Authors agrees/agree to index their article in databases at home and abroad, including abstracts and keywords as well as Authors’ affiliation in English and in other languages. The Author/Authors agrees/agree to pass on the information mentioned above to the owners of these databases.
-
The Author/Authors declares/declare that the article is free of plagiarism.
-
The Author/Authors declares/declare that funding and conflict of interest information has been included in the article.
-
The Author/Authors accepts/accept that the author is aware of the consequences of scientific dishonesty, which, once detected, will be documented and disclosed to the public, and information about it will be communicated to the relevant institutions (universities employing the authors, scientific societies, publishing houses, etc.).
-
The Author/Authors declares/declare to publish the text in the Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0).
- For one Author. Please complete the Author Statement and send it to the editorial office. Please download, complete, scan and attach the file in the system during the submission process.
Download: Author Statement -
For more than one Author. The Authors declare to bear complete responsibility for the scientific reliability of the article submitted. The detailed contribution of all co-authors is defined. Please complete the Authors Statement-Authorship Contributions and send it to the editorial office. Please indicate the specific contributions made by each author (list the authors’ initials, e.g., JKH). Please download, complete, scan and attach the file in the system during the submission process.
Download: Authors Statement - Authorship Contributions
