Concerning the supposed illusoriness of the self and free will
Abstract
Many philosophers, psychologists and neuroscientists argue for the thesis that both the self and free will - as commonly understood by us - are illusions created by our nervous system. An example of such a line of argument can be found in Bruce Hood’s book `The Self Illusion: How the Social Brain Creates Identity'. I first consider the main ideas put forward by Hood in support of the view that the self and free will are illusions. Then I turn to criticisms of his arguments regarding the illusoriness of the self, citing arguments from philosophy and neuroscience. In criticizing his arguments for the illusoriness of free will, I advocate compatibilism and seek to focus on the elucidation of research into our everyday intuitions relating to free will.References
Baime, M. (2011), 'This is your brain on mindfulness', Shambhala Sun((July)), 45--48, 84--85.
Blackmore, S. (2005), Consciousness. A~very short introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, New York.
Bremer, J. (2008 (wyd.~1), 2014 (wyd.~2)), Osoba — fikcja czy rzeczywistość. Tożsamość i~jedność. Ja w~świetle badań neurologicznych, Aureus, Kraków.
Bremer, J. (2005), Jak to jest być świadomym. Analityczne teorie umysłu a~problem neuronalnych podstaw świadomości, IFiS PAN, Warszawa.
Bremer, J. (2010), Wprowadzenie do filozofii umysłu, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków.
Bremer, J. (2013), Czy wolna wola jest wolna? Kompatybilizm na tle badań interdyscyplinarnych, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków.
Castagnoli, L. (2010), Ancient self-refutation: the logic and history of the self-refutation argument from Democritus to Augustine, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York.
Dennett, D. C. (1991), Consciousness explained, Little, Brown and Co., Boston.
Di Francesco, M. & Marraffa, M. (2013), 'The unconscious, consciousness, and the Self illusion', Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences(6(1)), 10--22.
Falewicz, A. & Bak, W. (2016), 'Private vs. public self-consciousness and self-discrepancies', Current Issues in Personality Psychology(4(1)), 58--64.
Geisler, W. S. & Kersten, D. (2002), 'Illusions, perception and Bayes', Nature Neuroscience(5(6)), 508--510.
Gmeindl, L.; Chiu, Y. C.; Esterman, M. S.; Greenberg, A. S.; Courtney, S. M. & Yantis, S. (2016), 'Tracking the will to attend: Cortical activity indexes self-generated, voluntary shifts of attention, Attention, Perception', Psychophysics(78(7)), 2176--2184.
Greene, J. & Cohen, J. (2004), 'For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B(359(1451)), 1775--1785.
Harris, S. (2012), Free will, Free Press, New York.
Harris, S. & Hood, B. (2012), 'In what sense is self an illusion? — Bruce Hood interviewed by Sam Harris', The Radical Humanist(76(5)), 5--7.
Hood, B. (2012), The self illusion: How the social brain creates identity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
Johnson, S. P.Rubenstein, J.; Rakic, P. & Tager-Flusberg, H., ed., (2013), Development of the visual system, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp. 249--269.
Marraffa, M. (2014), 'The unconscious, self-consciousness, and responsibility', Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia(5(2)), 207--220.
Metzinger, T.Greve, W., ed., (2000), Die Selbstmodell-Theorie der Subjektivität. Eine Kurzdarstellung für Nicht-Philosophen in fünf Schritten, Psychologie Verlag Union, Weinheim, pp. 317--336.
Nahmias, E.Kane, R., ed., (2011), Intuitions about free will, determinism and bypassing, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, pp. 555--576.
Nahmias, E.; Morris, S.; Nadelhoffer, T. & Turner, J. (2005), 'Surveying freedom: Folk intuitions about free will and moral responsibility', Philosophical Psychology(18(5)), 561--584.
Nahmias, E. & Murray, D.Aguilar, J. H.; Buckareff, A. A. & Frankish, K., ed., (2011), Experimental philosophy on free will: An error theory for incompatibilist intuitions, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 189--216.
Rager, G. & von Brück, M. (2012), Grundzüge einer modernen Anthropologie, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
Searle, J. R. (2010), Umysł. Krótkie wprowadzenie, Rebis, Poznań.
Van Inwagen, P.Feinberg, J. & Shafer-Landau, R., ed., (2013), Freedom of the will, Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Boston, pp. 409--418.
Wegner, D. M. (2002), The illusion of conscious will, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
(), Free will, Merriam-Webster, Incorporated.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.