The Controversy Between Professors Fryderyk Skarbek and Feliks Bentkowski Regarding “Human Aspirations Towards Wealth and Improvement of Living Conditions”, Featured in the “Warsaw Memoir of Pure and Applied Sciences” (1829)
As an Expression of Anxieties and Fears Associated with the Dissemination of New Personal Models Inspired by Franklinism in Polish Culture
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to reconstruct and present, within a broader cultural context, a relatively unknown controversy that emerged in 1829 within the pages of the “Warsaw Memoir of Pure and Applied Sciences” (vol. 1), between two professors from the Royal University of Warsaw. The initial polemical article titled “Request for Clarification” was authored by Feliks Bentkowski, followed by a response titled “Reply to the Request for Clarification Published in the Memoir” penned by Count Fryderyk Skarbek. The impetus for this debate was Skarbek’s translation of Charles Ganilh’s work “Dictionary of Political Economy”, which he significantly augmented with his own annotations.
Although Ganilh’s work, as translated by Skarbek, primarily pertained to political economy, the ensuing debate also indirectly related to significant phenomena within the contemporary Polish culture, such as the dissemination of new (foreign) values, attitudes, customs, and cultural patterns. This article views the polemical exchanges between Bentkowski and Skarbek within a broad cultural context, recognizing them as reflections of the societal, cultural, and civilizational discussions and disputes of the time, as well as manifestations of the fears and anxieties typical for certain segments of the pre-uprising Polish society. Furthermore, this polemic indirectly offers an interesting perspective on the reception of Franklinian ideas in Poland during the early decades of the 19th century. The primary sources for this study are the two polemical publications from 1829. However, given that the controversy is situated within a wider cultural context, other texts from the culture of the Kingdom of Poland, including strictly literary works, were also consulted.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ignatianum University in Cracow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Yearbook only accepts materials for publication that are free of all conflicts of interest, and that in no way involve conflicts over authorship, copyright, etc. The Editors will take action against any cases of plagiarizing, ghostwriting1, guest/honorary authorship2, etc. Where co-authored work is concerned, the Author listed first is expected to take responsibility for the submission, and is required to make clear the contributions of all of the Co-Authors involved. In the event of the publication owing its existence to funding dedicated to this purpose, this fact should be made clear: e.g. in any note of thanks/acknowledgement, or in a footnote, etc. Explicit notification should be given of any form of reprinting, with the appropriate evidence of permission to publish being furnished as required. Any impropriety on the part of Authors/Reviewers risks exposing them to appropriate responses from the relevant institutions.
______
1 This term refers to instances of a person who has made an essential contribution being omitted from the list of authors, or from notes conveying gratitude and/or acknowledgement.
2 This occurs when a person who has made either an insignificant contribution or no contribution at all nevertheless appears on the list of authors.
