Values in Ethics Teaching in Grades 3 to 6 of Finnish Basic Education

Keywords: ethical education, ethics, values, values in education, curriculum in primary education

Abstract

The article begins with a review and analysis of the literature on educational reform in Finland, with particular reference to values education and secular ethics. The analysis of the curriculum began with a review of the literature on secular ethics in Finnish basic education. The next stage was to analyse the curriculum along with the curricular guidelines and support for primary schools in grades 3–6, especially with regard to what is applicable to all schools in Finland; this involved a review of the literature on educational reform in Finland, values in teaching and secular ethics. The article addresses a key issue in curriculum policy: ethics education in grades 3–6. The article explores what is embodied in this policy, especially the objectives of the subject of ethics.

 The problem method and critical discourse analysis were applied to the study of documents concerning educational reform and the study of discourses in political rhetoric. The problem method is based on an educational phenomenon related to time and society, so it was necessary to contrast the different views presented in contemporary Finnish education and to examine various consistent factors. Education here is thus an interaction between the various sets of teachers’ values and the ongoing construction of students’ values. This method of primary education encourages appropriate conditions for lifelong learning for each student. Suggested lessons may include discussions with students about values so that students perceive the variance in values and are able to think about them in a constructive and critical manner.

References

Berkowitz, M. W. (1996). The “plus one” convention revisited and beyond [Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Moral Education].

Carr, D., & Steutel, J. (Eds). (1999). Virtue ethics and moral education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203978368

Clausnitzer, J. (2019, March 16). PISA student performance in Finland from 2000 to 2018, by subject and score. Statista.com. https://www.statista.com/statistics/986919/pisa-student-performance-by-field-and-score-finland

Finnish National Agency of Education. (2016). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. Juvenes Print-Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy.

Finnish National Board of Education. (2019, March 20). National core curriculum for basic education. http://www.oph.fi/english/curricula_and_qualifications/basic_education

Halinen, I., & Holappa, M. S. (2013). Curricular balance based on dialogue, cooperation and trust: The case of Finland. In W. Kuiper & J. Berkvens (Eds.), Balancing curriculum regulation and freedom across Europe (pp. 39–62). SLO Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

Halstead, J. M., & Taylor, M. J. (2000). Learning and teaching about values: A review of recent research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 169–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/713657146

Hammersley, M. (2013). What is qualitative research? Sage.

Kennedy, M., Fisher, M. B., & Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical thinking: Literature review and needed research. In L. Idol & B. F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 11–40). Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.

Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659207654519

McLaren, P. (1994a). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Longman.

McLaren, P. (1994b). Foreword: Critical thinking as a political project. In K. S. Walters (Ed.), Re-thinking reason: New perspectives in critical thinking (pp. ix–xv). State University of New York Press.

Cavallini, J. Friedl, M. Volpe, C. Zuccaro P.(Fondazione FORMIT). A New Skills Agenda for Europe, https://cor.europa.eu/en/engage/studies/Documents/New-Skills-Agenda-Europe.pdf

Niemi, H. (2014a). Teachers as active contributors in quality of education: A special reference to the Finnish context. In D. Hung, K. Y. T. Lim, & S.-S. Lee (Eds.), Adaptivity as a transformative disposition for learning in the 21st century. (pp. 179–199). Springer Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/2F978-981-4560-17-7

Niemi, H. (2014b). Purposeful policy and practice for equity and quality: A Finnish case. In S. K. Lee, W. O. Lee, & E. L. Low (Eds.), Educational policy innovations. Education innovation series. Springer Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-4560-08-5_7

OECD. (2019, March 20). The future of education and skills 2030. (https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf)

Paul, R. W. (1992). Critical thinking, what every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Purpel, D. E. (1989). The moral and spiritual crisis in education: A curriculum for justice and compassion in education. Bergin & Harvey.

Rapley, T. (2007). Analiza konwersacji, dyskursu i dokumentów [Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis]. Polskie Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.

Suwalska A. (2017). Lifelong guidance in Finnish education in the context of globalisation. Studia Pedagogiczne, Vol. L/2017, 69–80.

Välijärvi, J., Kupari, P., Linnakylä, P., Reinikainen, P., Sulkunen, S., Törnroos, J., & Arffmanet I. (2007). The Finnish success in PISA—and some reasons behind it. Kirjapaino Oma Oy.

Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (Eds.) (2008). Qualitative discursive analysis in the social sciences. Palgrave Macmillan.

Published
2022-12-28
How to Cite
Suwalska, A. (2022). Values in Ethics Teaching in Grades 3 to 6 of Finnish Basic Education. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education, 11(2 (22), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2022.1122.15