Action Research as a Path to Change in the Teaching/Learning Process

Keywords: action research, universal design in education (UDL), inclusive education, teaching-learning process, change in the educational process

Abstract

Objectives of the research: The aim of this article is to present the action research method and the methodology for its implementation, using the example of a framework report of research conducted by the author. The research presented herein was designed to capture the changes in the teaching/learning process in a selected classroom following the implementation of the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) approach.

Research methods: The method used in the research was the action research method.

A short description of the context of the issue: In a rapidly changing world, education researchers face the challenge of how to study and analyze the educational process, which is (and must remain) changeable in order to keep up with the changing reality. Action research is an interesting methodological proposal. Three cycles of research are presented; for each cycle, the planning process (including research questions), actions taken, data collection methods, and results were specified separately.

Research findings: The analysis shows that the research and innovative activities resulted in the development of students’ skills in planning, organizing, and managing their learning, as well as the development of their independence, responsibility, creativity, and problem-solving skills. Their willingness to cooperate also increased. As a result, they became more active (self‑)learners. At the same time, the teachers shifted from their traditional, central role of teaching others to that of facilitators, creating learning conditions for a diverse group of students.

Conclusions and recommendations: It was demonstrated that action research is a valuable way of bringing about reflective change in the teaching/learning process. Action research is worth promoting to teacher-practitioners, as it is an effective way to introduce bottom-up changes that optimize the educational process.

References

Capp, M. J. (2017). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(21), 791–807.

Carr, W., & Kemmis, B. (1997). Becoming critical education, knowledge and action research. The Falmer Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Projektowanie badań naukowych. Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane [Designing scientific research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Czerepaniak-Walczak, M. (2014). Badanie w działaniu w kształceniu i doskonaleniu nauczycieli [Action research in teacher education and development]. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych, 19(2), 181–194.

Domagała-Zyśk, E. (2017). Projektowanie uniwersalne w edukacji osób z wadą słuchu [Universal design in the education of people with hearing impairments]. In M. Nowak, E. Stoch, & B. Borowska (Eds.), Z problematyki teatrologii i pedagogiki [On the issues of theater studies and pedagogy] (pp. 553–568). Wydawnictwo Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego.

Galkiene, A., & Monkeviciene, O. (Eds.). (2021). Improving inclusive education through Universal Design for Learning. Springer.

Kubinowski, D. (2010). Jakościowe badania pedagogiczne. Filozofia. Metodyka. Ewaluacja [Qualitative pedagogical research: Philosophy, methodology, and evaluation]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.

Minister of National Education. Obwieszczenie Ministra Edukacji Narodowej z dnia 9 lipca 2020 w sprawie ogłoszenia jednolitego tekstu rozporządzenia Ministra Edukacji Narodowej w sprawie warunków organizowania kształcenia, wychowania i opieki dla dzieci i młodzieży niepełnosprawnych, niedostosowanych społecznie i zagrożonych niedostosowaniem społecznym [Notice of the Minister of National Education of July 9, 2020 regarding the publication of the consolidated text of the Regulation of the Minister of National Education on the conditions for organizing the education, upbringing, and care of children and adolescents with disabilities and those who are socially maladjusted or at risk of social maladjustment]. Dz.U. poz. 1309 [Journal of Laws, item 1309].

Pachociński, R. (1993). Problemy epistemologiczne badań pedagogicznych [Epistemological problems of pedagogical research]. Edukacja, 3, 17–26.

Pilch, T., & Bauman, T. (2010). Zasady badań pedagogicznych. Strategie ilościowe i jakościowe [Principles of pedagogical research: Quantitative and qualitative strategies]. Wydawnictwo Akademickie Żak.

Rose, D. H., Gravel, J. W., & Gordon, D. T. (2014). Universal design for learning. In L. Florian (Ed.), Sage handbook of special education (pp. 475–489). Sage.

Rose, D. H., Meyer, A., & Hitchcock, C. (2005). The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies. Cambridge University Press.

Sagor, R. (2011). Badanie przez działanie. Jak wspólnie badać, żeby lepiej uczyć [Action research: How to research together to teach better]. Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej.

Skulicz, D. (1998). Badanie w działaniu [Action research]. In S. Palka (Ed.), Orientacje w metodologii badań pedagogicznych [Orientations in the methodology of pedagogical research]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Smolińska-Theiss, B. (1990). Badanie przez działanie w pedagogice społecznej [Action research in social pedagogy]. Kultura i społeczeństwo, 1990, 1, 32–43.

Szmidt, K. J. (2001). Szkolne inhibitory twórczej aktywności uczniów w świetle wyników badań typu action research [School inhibitors of students’ creative activity in light of the results of action research]. In B. Śliwerski (Ed.), Nowe konteksty (dla) edukacji alternatywnej XXI wieku [New contexts (for) alternative education in the 21st century] (pp. 305–328). Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”.

Szmidt, K. J., & Modrzejewska-Świgulska, M. (2015). Walidacja komunikacyjna w analizie wyników badań pedagogicznych [Communication validation in the analysis of pedagogical research results]. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych, 2(19), 235–255.

Szymańska, M. (2018). Badania w działaniu [Action research]. In M. Ciechowska & M. Szymańska (Eds.), Wybrane metody jakościowe w badaniach pedagogicznych [Selected qualitative methods in pedagogical research] (pp. 225–272). Wydawnictwo WAM.

Szymańska, M., Ciechowska, M., Pieróg, K., & Gołąb, S. (Eds.). (2018). Badania w działaniu w praktyce pedagogicznej. Wybrane przykłady [Action research in teaching practice: Selected examples]. Wydawnictwo WAM.

Walulik, A. (2018). Formacyjny charakter badań w działaniu [The formative nature of action research]. In M. Szymańska, M. Ciechowska, K. Pieróg, & S. Gołąb (Eds.), Badania w działaniu w praktyce pedagogicznej. Wybrane przykłady [Action research in teaching practice: Selected examples] (pp. 9–20). Wydawnictwo WAM.

Wołodźko, E. (2010). Badania w działaniu. Refleksja – wiedza – emancypacja [Action research: Reflection – knowledge – emancipation]. In H. Kędzierska (Ed.), Jakościowe inspiracje w badaniach edukacyjnych [Qualitative inspirations in educational research] (pp. 103–126). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego.

Wyka, A. (1993). Badacz społeczny wobec doświadczenia [Social researcher and experience]. Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.

Published
2023-12-30
How to Cite
Cierpiałowska, T. (2023). Action Research as a Path to Change in the Teaching/Learning Process. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education, 12(2 (24), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2023.1224.13