Teachers’ and principals’ experiences with assessing Ukrainian students in Polish schools
Abstract
Research objectives (aims) and problem(s): The purpose of this article is to describe the experiences and strategies adopted by teachers and principals in response to the challenge of evaluating Ukrainian students. The research questions are as follows: What difficulties and obstacles do school teachers face in the process of assessing Ukrainian students? What strategies have teachers developed for evaluating these students?
Research methods: Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with teachers and principals from schools enrolling students from Ukraine. A total of 10 interviews were conducted.
Process of argumentation: The article discusses the legal aspects relevant to the research topic, dominant approaches to grading in Polish didactics (objectivist and constructivist), and a review of current research in this area. It also outlines the methodological assumptions and presents the findings according to the research questions.
Research findings and their impact on the development of educational sciences: The main challenges in grading Ukrainian students included a lack of systemic support, language barriers, the absence of preparatory departments, the limited effectiveness of mixed-class instruction, and the short duration of Ukrainian students’ education in Polish schools. Strategies adopted by teachers included modifying or adjusting grading criteria and applying a “profit or loss” calculus—choosing to promote or not promote a student—often justified as being “in the best interest of the child.”
Conclusions and/or recommendations: The strategies employed by teachers expose the inefficiency of the current grading system. The sole function of assessment has become the decision to promote students to the next grade. Ukrainian students, by virtue of their extraordinary circumstances, have in some ways contributed to exposing the overemphasis on grades in the Polish educational system. We underscore the need to move away from traditional grading toward more inclusive, student-centered approaches that take cultural context into account.
References
Adie, L. E., Willis, J., & Van der Kleij, F. M. (2018). Diverse perspectives on student agency in classroom assessment. Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0262-2
Amnesty International Polska. (2023). Jesteśmy tutaj razem. Uczniowie i uczennice z Ukrainy w polskich szkołach. Wyniki monitoringu [We are here together. Male and female students from Ukraine in Polish schools]. https://www.amnesty.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Jestesmy-tutaj-razem.-Uczniowie-i-uczennice-z-Ukrainy-w-polskich-szkolach-2.pdf
Andrade, H. L., Brookhart, S. M., & ChingYen Yu, E. (2021). Classroom assessment as co-regulated learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.751168
Bałachowicz, J. (2009). Style działań edukacyjnych nauczycieli klas początkowych. Między uprzedmiotowieniem a podmiotowością [Styles of educational activities of early grade teachers. Between objectification and subjectivity]. Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Pedagogicznej TWP.
Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Brookhart, S. (2024). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers revisited. Education Sciences, 14(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070751
Ćwikła, E. (2021). Ocena opisowa w dyskursie kształtowania podmiotowości dziecka [Descriptive assessment in the discourse of child subjectivity formation]. Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
Czerepaniak-Walczak, M. (2001). Ocenianie formatywne w kontekście kompetencji emancypacyjnych. In K. Wenta (Ed.), Pomiar edukacyjny jako kompetencje pedagogiczne [Educational measurement as a pedagogical competence] (pp. 39–48). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.
Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128
Dolata, R., Hawrot, A., Humenny, G., Jasińska-Maciążek, A., Koniewski, M., Majkut, P., Blukacz, M., Grygiel, P., & Otręba-Szklarczyk, A. (2015). (Ko)warianty efektywności nauczania. Wyniki badania w klasach IV–VI [Co(variants) of teaching effectiveness. Results of a study in grades IV–VI]. Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset. Random House.
Earl, L. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximise student learning (2nd ed.). Corwin.
Faber, G., & Bilmann-Mahecha, E. (2010). Notengebung im Spiegel wissenschaftlicher Untersuchungen. Probleme, Erfordernisse und Möglichkeiten aus pädagogisch-psychologischer Sicht. Lernchancen, 13(74), 30–33.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
Groenwald, M. (2014). Diagnozowanie – między etyką bliskiego a dalekiego zasięgu [Diagnosis – between near and long range ethics]. Ruch Pedagogiczny, 2, 39–54.
Groenwald, M. (2021). Nauczycielskie decydowanie [Teacher decision making]. Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
Herbst, M., & Sitek, M. (2023). Education in exile: Ukrainian refugee students in the schooling system in Poland following the Russian–Ukrainian war. European Journal of Education, 58, 575–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12587
Kamińska, K. (2019). Edukacja dzieci z doświadczeniami migracyjnymi w polskiej szkole – problemy i wyzwania [Education of children with migration experience in Polish school – problems and challenges]. Edukacja, 3(150), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.24131/3724.190302
Lalak, D. (2010). Życie jako biografia. Podejście biograficzne w perspektywie pedagogicznej [Life as biography. A biographical approach in a pedagogical perspective]. Wydawnictwo Akademickie Żak.
Little, T., Dawson, P., Boud, D., & Tai, J. (2025). What does it take to provide effective peer feedback? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2475059
Młynarczuk-Sokołowska, A. (2022). Codzienność polskiej szkoły z perspektywy dzieci i młodzieży ze środowiska przymusowych migrantów [Everyday life in a Polish school from the perspective of children and adolescents from a forced migrant background]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.
Nayır, F., Brown, M., Burns, D., O’Hara, J., McNamara, G., Nortvedt, G. A., Skedsmo, G., Gloppen, S. K., & Wiese, E. F. (2019). Assessment with and for migration background students – Cases from Europe. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(79), 39–68.
Neugebauer, M., Klein, O., & Jacob, M. (2022). Migrant teachers in the classroom: A key to reduce ethnic disadvantages in school? International Studies in Sociology of Education, 33(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2022.2132983
Polak, K. (2000). Podążając ku niewidzialnemu (Teorie indywidualne nauczycieli). In K. Kruszewski (Ed.), Pedagogika w pokoju nauczycielskim [Pedagogy in the teachers’ room] (pp. 155–176). WSiP.
Pyżalski, J., Łuczyńska, A., Kata, G., Plichta, P., & Poleszak, W. (2022). Raport: Razem w klasie. Dzieci z Ukrainy w polskich szkołach. Potencjały i wyzwania w budowaniu wielokulturowej szkoły w kontekście wojny w Ukrainie według nauczycieli i nauczycielek. Raport z badania [Report: Together in the classroom. Children from Ukraine in Polish schools. Potentials and challenges in building a multicultural school in the context of the war in Ukraine according to male and female teachers. Report on the study]. Fundacja Szkoła z klasą. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/raport-z-badania-razem-w-klasie-9-09-2022.pdf
Schütze, F. (2006). Analiza biograficzna ugruntowana empirycznie w autobiograficznym wywiadzie narracyjnym. Jak analizować autobiograficzne wywiady narracyjne? In K. Kaźmierska (Ed.), Metoda biograficzna w socjologii. Antologia tekstów [The biographical method in sociology. An anthology of texts]. Wydawnictwo NOMOS.
Seynhaeve, S., Vanbuel, M., Kavadias, D., & Deygers, B. (2024). Equitable education for migrant students? Investigating the educational success of newly arrived migrants in Flanders. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1431289. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1431289
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128(3330).
Szyling, G. (2011). Nauczycielskie praktyki oceniania poza standardami [Teachers’ grading practices beyond standards]. Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
Szyling, G. (2014). Teoria i praktyka oceniania szkolnego [Theory and practice of school assessment]. Ruch Pedagogiczny, 2, 67–82.
Tędziagolska, M., Walczak, B., & Żelazowska-Kosiorek, A. (2022). Raport: Szkoła zróżnicowana kulturowo. Wyzwania i potrzeby związane z napływem uczniów z Ukrainy [Report: Culturally diverse schools. Challenges and needs related to the influx of students from Ukraine]. https://ceo.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/CEO_Szkola-zroznicowana-kulturowo_raport_sierpien22.pdf
Tędziagolska, M., Walczak, B., & Wielecki, K. M. (2023). Uczniowie uchodźczy w polskich szkołach. Gdzie jesteśmy u progu kolejnego roku szkolnego? [Refugee students in Polish schools. Where are we at the dawn of another school year?] https://ceo.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/RaportUczniowieuchodzczywpolskichszkolachCEOwrzesien2023.pdf
Tomasik, A. (2024). Szkoła dostępna dla wszystkich – z perspektywy dyrektora. Ocenianie uczniów z doświadczeniem migracji [A school accessible to all – from the principal’s perspective. Assessing students with migration experience]. Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.
Copyright (c) 2025 Agnieszka Koterwas, Edyta Nowosielska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
The Author/Authors declares/declare that their publication is original has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere and does not include borrowings from other works which might cause Publisher's responsibility, does not infringe the rights of the third party and that their copyright on this publication is not limited. The Author/Authors will incur all the costs and will pay compensations which might result from the mendacity of the following statement.
-
The Author/Authors declares/declare that issues about publication ethics, have been appropriately considered.
-
The Author/Authors agrees/agree to publish the article free of charge in Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education in English or Spanish. The Editorial Board reserves the right to shorten the texts and change the titles.
-
As part of free publication mentioned in § 1, the Author/Authors agrees/agree to make the full electronic version of their article available in the Internet.
- The Author/Authors agrees/agree to index their article in databases at home and abroad, including abstracts and keywords as well as Authors’ affiliation in English and in other languages. The Author/Authors agrees/agree to pass on the information mentioned above to the owners of these databases.
-
The Author/Authors declares/declare that the article is free of plagiarism.
-
The Author/Authors declares/declare that funding and conflict of interest information has been included in the article.
-
The Author/Authors accepts/accept that the author is aware of the consequences of scientific dishonesty, which, once detected, will be documented and disclosed to the public, and information about it will be communicated to the relevant institutions (universities employing the authors, scientific societies, publishing houses, etc.).
-
The Author/Authors declares/declare to publish the text in the Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0).
- For one Author. Please complete the Author Statement and send it to the editorial office. Please download, complete, scan and attach the file in the system during the submission process.
Download: Author Statement -
For more than one Author. The Authors declare to bear complete responsibility for the scientific reliability of the article submitted. The detailed contribution of all co-authors is defined. Please complete the Authors Statement-Authorship Contributions and send it to the editorial office. Please indicate the specific contributions made by each author (list the authors’ initials, e.g., JKH). Please download, complete, scan and attach the file in the system during the submission process.
Download: Authors Statement - Authorship Contributions
