A Literature Review on Teaching Ethical Creativity in Primary Education
Abstract
As the world emerges from the COVID-19 pandemic and continues to struggle with armed conflicts, creative and ethical solutions to the controversial issues of recent years are needed globally. While creativity is necessary, it must also be ethically sound. Today, discussing creativity in relation to its ethical dimensions has also been emphasized in the perspective of sustainable development, but research on the teaching and learning of ethical creativity remains limited. Therefore, the aim of this paper is twofold: 1) to describe how primary schools engage students on ethical creativity and 2) to suggest a didactic model for ethical creativity based on the teaching strategies found in a literature review. Internationally, creativity and ethics have been addressed in curricula and studied within the field of education. However, research on the ethical dimensions of creativity (ethical creativity) is limited. Based on a literature review, five teaching strategies for engaging primary school students on ethical creativity have been identified. The common features among the five teaching strategies relate to the use of 1) digital tools/media, 2) art and literature, 3) real problems and dilemmas, and 4) enquiry-based learning. A three-step teaching model is suggested for teaching ethical creativity. The implications of the paper relate to enhancing ethical creativity among our children, who are both future citizens and leaders in various professions in the global society.
References
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Ashbrook, P. (2020). Engineering design and open exploration breadcrumb. Science and children, 57(6). https://www.nsta.org/science-and-children/science-and-children-february-2020/engineering-design-and-open-exploration
Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity in teaching. In J. C. Kaufman, V. P. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 549–564). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316274385.030
Bland, D. (2016). Imagination for inclusion: Diverse contexts of educational practice [Electronic resource]. Taylor and Francis.
Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis.
Bryden, J., & Gezelius, S. S. (2017). Innovation as if people mattered: The ethics of innovation for sustainable development. Innovation and Development, 7(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2017.1281208
Butler, J. (2013). Stages for children inventing games. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(4), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2013.773828
Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2011). Post it! A cross-disciplinary approach to teach socioscientific issues. Teaching Science, 57(3), 25–28.
Chang Rundgren, S. N., & Rundgren, C. J. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view of socioscientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1–24.
Cheng, V. M. (2010). Tensions and dilemmas of teachers in creativity reform in a Chinese context. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(3), 120–137. https://doi-org.ezp.sub.su.se/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.09.005
Cheng, V. M. (2019). Developing individual creativity for environmental sustainability: Using an everyday theme in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.05.001
Cropley, A. (2014). Neglect of creativity in education: A moral issue. In S. Moran, D. Cropley, & J. Kaufman (Eds.), The ethics of creativity. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cropley, D. (2010). The dark side of creativity [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press.
Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2013). The dark side of creativity in the classroom: The paradox of classroom teaching. In J. B. Jones & L. J. Flint (Eds.), The creative imperative: School librarians and teachers cultivating curiosity together (pp. 39–52). ABC-CLIO, LLC.
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2013). Creativity: The psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
Deliège, I., & Richelle, M. (2006). Prelude: The spectrum of musical creativity. In I. Deliège & G. A. Wiggins (Eds.), Musical creativity: Multidisciplinary research in theory and practice (pp. 1–6). Psychology Press.
Franck, O., & Osbeck, C. (Eds.). (2017). Ethical literacies and education for sustainable development: Young people, subjectivity and democratic participation. Springer.
Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and method. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Gordon, J., Halász, G., & Krawczyk, M. (2009). Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education. CASE Network Reports, 87. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1517804
Hobbs, R. (2011). Empowering learners with digital and media literacy. Knowledge Quest, 39(5), 12–17.
Hong, N. S. (1998). The relationship between well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving in multimedia simulation [Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University]. ProQuest Dissertations.
Ismayilova, K., & Bolander Laksov, K. (2022). Teaching creatively in higher education: The roles of personal attributes and environment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2042732
Johnson, S. R. (2013). “Tuck everlasting”: Nurturing students’ comprehension, creativity, and critical thinking. English in Texas, 43(1), 36–38.
Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707300703
Lee, L., & Misco, T. (2016). Seeking moral autonomy in a Chinese context: A study of elementary moral education standards. Journal of International Social Studies, 6(2), 84–95.
Lo, M. L. & Marton, F. (2012). Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251211179678
Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In defence of the school: A public issue. E-ducation, Culture & Society Publishers.
Moore, L. J. (2007). Ethical and organisational tensions for work‐based learners. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620710735639
Moran, S., Cropley, D., & Kaufman, J. (Eds.). (2014). The ethics of creativity [Electronic resource]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Musacchio, G., Lanza, T., & D'Addezio, G. (2015). An experience of science theatre to introduce earth interior and natural hazards to children. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(4), 80–90.
Niepel, C., Mustafić, M., & Greiff, S. (2015). The dark side of creativity revisited: Is students’ creativity associated with subsequent decreases in their ethical decision making? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.04.005
Ormiston, M., Hatlen, B., & Hopkins, K. (2017). NOW classrooms, grades K-2: Lessons for enhancing teaching and learning through technology [NOW classrooms series]. Solution Tree.
Patston, T. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2021). What is creativity in education? A qualitative study of international curricula. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(2), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20978356
Phye, G. D. (1992). Strategic transfer: A tool for academic problem solving. Educational Psychology Review, 4(4), 393–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01332145
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Rundgren, C. J., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2018). Aiming for responsible and competent citizenship through teacher professional development on teaching socioscientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL). Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(2), 1–27.
Sahlin, N. E. (2001). Kreativitetens filosofi [The philosophy of creativity]. Nora: Nya Doxa.
Sandri, O. J. (2013). Exploring the role and value of creativity in education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.749978
Serriere, S. C., Burroughs, M. D., & Mitra, D. L. (2017). Kindergartners and “philosophical dialogue”: Supporting child agency in the classroom. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 29(4), 8–12.
Silverman, L. K. (1995). Effective techniques for teaching highly gifted visual-spatial learners [Non-Classroom Guide].
Skolverket. (2019). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011: Reviderad 2019 [Curriculum for compulsory school, preschool class, and after-school center, 2011: Revised 2019] (6th ed.). Skolverket.
Teräs, M., Chang Rundgren, S-N., & Eliasson, E. (2020). Vocational teacher students’ perceptions of 21st century skills in a vocational education program in Sweden. In L. Moreno Herrera, M. Teräs, & P. Gougoulakis (Eds.), Teaching, learning and teacher education: Emerging issues in research on vocational education & training (Vol. 5, pp. 394–426). Arenagruppen.
Copyright (c) 2022 Frans Hagerman, Shu-Nu Chang Rundgren
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- The Author/Authors agree(s) to publish the article free of charge in Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education in English or Spanish. The Editorial Board reserves the right to shorten the texts and change the titles.
- As part of free publication mentioned in § 1, the Author/Authors agrees to make the full electronic version of their article available in the Internet.
- The Author/Authors agrees to index their article in databases at home and abroad, including abstracts and keywords as well as Author's/Authors’ affiliation in English and in other languages. The Author/Authors agrees to pass on the information mentioned above to the owners of these databases.
- The Author/Authors declares that their publication is original and does not include borrowings from other works which might cause Publisher's responsibility, does not infringe the rights of the third party and that their copyright on this publication is not limited. The Author/Authors will incur all the costs and will pay compensations which might result from the mendacity of the following statement.
- The Author/Authors declares to bear complete responsibility for the scientific reliability of the article submitted. The detailed contribution of all co-authors is defined.
- The Author/Authors declares to publish the text in the Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0).
- For more than one author, please complete the Authorship Contributions and send it to the editorial office. Please indicate the specific contributions made by each author (list the authors’ initials, e.g., JKH). Please download, complete, scan and attach the file in the system during the submission process.
Authors Statement - Authorship Contributions
