The Nature of Support Provided to Gifted Primary School Students Is Based on the Teacher’s Concept of Giftedness
Abstract
The aim of the research was to identify the type of support that teachers provide to gifted students in grades 4–6 of primary schools in Poland in relation to their concepts of giftedness. Teachers’ understanding of the category of gifted students was analyzed: What do they find crucial in identifying gifted students? What areas of gifted students’ development are most important to them? Are there differences in the strategies for supporting gifted students between teachers who have different concepts of giftedness and who teach different subjects? The research was conducted on a group of 188 teachers using the standardized 20-item Balanced Development of Gifted Students Questionnaire. It helped identify the scope of the teachers’ activities in the cognitive, emotional/social, motivational, and creative spheres. It was shown that the dominant concept of giftedness among the surveyed teachers was cognitive and that their activities supporting gifted students were mainly aimed at mental development and knowledge acquisition. Support of the emotional/social sphere of gifted students was least frequently indicated by the respondents. There was consistency between the type of support provided and the teacher’s preferred concept of giftedness. There were significant differences in the definition of giftedness and the related type of support between teachers of different subjects. The subject which they taught also significantly differentiated the number of students identified as gifted: The most gifted students were identified by the art teachers, while the least were identified by the math teachers. The results may serve as guidelines for developing teachers’ competencies in working with gifted students by popularizing the concept of balanced development and making them aware of the links between beliefs about giftedness and the type of support provided.
References
Brzezińska, A. (2013). Psychologia a edukacja: pomoc psychologiczna wobec transformacji systemu edukacji [Psychology and education: Psychological assistance in the face of the transformation of the education system]. Edukacja, 5(125), 206–216.
Carman, C. A. (2011). Stereotypes of giftedness in current and future educators. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(5), 790–812. DOI: 10.1177/0162353211417340
Cieślikowska, J., & Limont, W. (2010). Obraz ucznia zdolnego w potocznych koncepcjach nauczycieli [The image of the gifted student in the colloquial conceptions of teachers] In W. Limont, J. Cieślikowska, & J. Dreszer (Eds.), Osobowościowe i środowiskowe uwarunkowania rozwoju ucznia zdolnego [Personality and environmental determinants of the development of a gifted student], (Vol. 2, pp. 11–26). WN UMK.
Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2014). Paradigms of gifted education: A guide to theory-based, practice-focused research. Prufrock Press.
De Wet, C. F., & Gubbins, E. J. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs about culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse gifted students: A quantitative study. Roeper Review, 33(2), 97–108. DOI: 10.1080/02783193.2011.554157
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House Publishing Group.
Endepohls-Ulpe, M., & Ruf, H. (2005). Primary school teachers’ criteria for the identification of gifted pupils. High Ability Studies, 16(2), 219–228. DOI: 10.1080/13598130600618140
Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2008). Teachers’ negative affect toward academically talented gifted students: An evolutionary psychological study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217–231.
Heller, K., Finsterwald, M., & Ziegler, A. (2001). Implicit theories of German mathematics and physics teachers on gender-specific giftedness and motivation. Psychologische Beitrage, 43(1), 78–90.
Hernández-Torrano, D., Prieto, M. D., Ferrándiz, C., Bermejo, R., & Sáinz, M. (2013). Characteristics leading teachers to nominate secondary students as gifted in Spain. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(3), 181–196. DOI: 10.1177/0016986213490197
Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych. (2021). Raport z badania: Monitorowanie uwzględniania zróżnicowanych potrzeb edukacyjnych uczniów w procesie kształcenia [Research report: Monitoring the inclusion of students’ diverse learning needs in the educational process].
Knopik, T. (2018). Zafascynowani światem. Efektywne wspieranie rozwoju zdolności i zainteresowań uczniów w codziennej praktyce szkolnej [Fascinated by the world: Effective support for the development of students’ abilities and interests in everyday school practice]. ORE.
Knopik, T. (2019). Nie marnujmy talentów! Wspieranie uczniów zdolnych w praktyce edukacyjnej. [Let’s not waste talent! Supporting gifted students in educational practice]. In I. Chrzanowska & G. Szumski (Eds.), Edukacja włączająca w przedszkolu i szkole [Inclusive education in kindergarten and school] (pp. 289–298). Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji.
Knopik, T., & Oszwa, U. (2022). Developing transferable competences of students: The self-determination theory and challenges of future education. Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny, 41(1), 53–66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2022.41.1.53–6
Laine, S., Kuusisto, E., & Tirri, K. (2016). Finnish teachers’ conceptions of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(2), 151–167. DOI: 10.1177/0162353216640936
Ledzińska, M. (2009). Myths, id est false knowledge on able pupils and its educational consequences. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 13, 54–65.
Lee, L. (1999). Teachers’ conceptions of gifted and talented young children. High Ability Studies, 10, 183–196.
Lewowicki, T. (1986). Kształcenie uczniów zdolnych [Teaching gifted students]. Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.
Limont, W. (2012). Uczeń zdolny. Jak go rozpoznać i jak z nim pracować? [A gifted student: How to recognize them and how to work with them?]. GWP.
Lo, C. O., Porath, M., Yu, H.-P., Chen, C.-M., Tsai, K.-F., & Wu, I.-C. (2019). Giftedness in the making: A transactional perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 172–184. DOI: 10.1177/0016986218812474
Matthews, D. J., & Folsom, C. (2009). Making connections: Cognition, emotion and a shifting paradigm. In T. Balchin, B. Hymer, & D. J. Matthews (Eds.), The Routledge international companion to gifted education (pp. 18–25). Routledge.
Mazzoli Smith, L., & Campbell, R. J. (2016). So-called giftedness and teacher education: Issues of equity and inclusion. Teachers and Teaching, 22(2), 1–13.
Moon, T. R., & Brighton, C. M. (2008). Primary teachers’ conceptions of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 447–480.
Najwyższa Izba Kontroli. (2016). Wspieranie uczniów zdolnych w woj. dolnośląskim. Raport. [Supporting gifted students in Lower Silesia: A report].
Pieronkiewicz, B. (Ed.) (2020). Different perspectives on transgressions in mathematics and its education. Wyd. UP.
Rimm, S. B. (2001). Underachievement: A continuing dilemma. In J. F. Smutny (Ed.), Underserved gifted populations (pp. 349–360). Hampton Press.
Schroth, S. T., & Helfer, J. A. (2009). Practitioners’ conceptions of academic talent and giftedness: Essential factors in deciding classroom and school composition. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(3), 384–403. DOI: 10.1177/1932202X0902000302
Sękowski, A. (2000). Osiągnięcia uczniów zdolnych [Achievements of gifted students]. Wydawnictwo KUL.
Sternberg, R. (1984). Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Science, 7(2), 269–315. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00044629.
Sternberg, R. (2000). Patterns of giftedness: A triarchic analysis. Roeper Review, 22(4), 231–235. DOI: 10.1080/02783190009554044.
Sternberg, R. (2007). Cultural dimensions of giftedness and talent. Roeper Review, 29, 160–165.
Sternberg, R. (2009). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized: A new model for liberal education. Liberal Education, 95(4),10–15.
Sternberg, R. (2015). Successful intelligence: A model for testing intelligence beyond IQ tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8(2) 76–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.09.004.
Sternberg, R. (2019). A theory of adaptive intelligence and its relation to general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 7(4), 23. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence7040023
Sternberg, R., Kaufman, J., & Roberts, A. (2019). The relation of creativity to intelligence and wisdom. In J. Kaufman & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed., (pp. 237–353). Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F. (1995). What do we mean by giftedness? A pentagonal implicit theory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), 88–94.
Copyright (c) 2022 Tomasz Knopik, Urszula Oszwa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- The Author/Authors agree(s) to publish the article free of charge in Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education in English or Spanish. The Editorial Board reserves the right to shorten the texts and change the titles.
- As part of free publication mentioned in § 1, the Author/Authors agrees to make the full electronic version of their article available in the Internet.
- The Author/Authors agrees to index their article in databases at home and abroad, including abstracts and keywords as well as Author's/Authors’ affiliation in English and in other languages. The Author/Authors agrees to pass on the information mentioned above to the owners of these databases.
- The Author/Authors declares that their publication is original and does not include borrowings from other works which might cause Publisher's responsibility, does not infringe the rights of the third party and that their copyright on this publication is not limited. The Author/Authors will incur all the costs and will pay compensations which might result from the mendacity of the following statement.
- The Author/Authors declares to bear complete responsibility for the scientific reliability of the article submitted. The detailed contribution of all co-authors is defined.
- The Author/Authors declares to publish the text in the Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0).
- For more than one author, please complete the Authorship Contributions and send it to the editorial office. Please indicate the specific contributions made by each author (list the authors’ initials, e.g., JKH). Please download, complete, scan and attach the file in the system during the submission process.
Authors Statement - Authorship Contributions
