Digital Natives in the Non-Digital University: A Case Study of Polish Higher Educational Institutions from an Educational and Historical Perspective

Keywords: educational technology, SARS-COV2, digital citizenship, digital immigrants, online learning

Abstract

According to the theory of technological determinism, the development and popularisation of communication techniques has led to the emergence of two groups of participants in internet discourse: (1) those who have been ‘immersed’ in the Internet since childhood – digital natives – and (2) those who remember functioning in the offline world – digital immigrants. The main goal of this article is to present the interpenetration of the needs and demands of digital education and the implementation of these demands in the academic environment. The first part of the article presents the main theories related to the topic and attempts to periodise the phenomenon of education at universities undergoing virtualisation. The second part presents research conducted with the use of the CATI method on a sample of 433 students and 133 university teachers concerning the IT revolution at universities related to the SARS-COV2 pandemic and the need to move classes from lecture halls to virtual spaces. The last part of the article answers the hypotheses posed: (1) the initial dysfunctions of the education process in universities were due to the institutions’ unpreparedness for the remote environment and (2) in the opinion of the respondents, the remote education process is not as effective as education in a lecture hall. The conclusions of the study indicate that it is necessary to systematically fund research on remote teaching methodology and tools for effective distance learning. In addition to research, it is also advisable to conduct training and continuously implement new practical solutions in the workplace so that the new media serve teachers and students. In order for distance education to be effective, it is necessary to redefine the use of new media, move away from control towards collaboration and allow students to take ownership of the learning process.

References

Bakhshi, H., Downing, J., Osborne, M., & Schneider, P. (2017). The future of skills employment in 2030. Person and Nesta.

Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, No. 2, 113–115.

Drucker, P. (1994). Praktyka zarządzania [The practice of management]. Spółdzielnia Wydawnicza Czytelnik.

Dublin, L. (2003). If you only look under the street lamps……Or nine e-Learning myths. https://www.learningguild.com/pdf/2/061603man.pdf

Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2013). University of London. In Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/University-of-London

Głomb, K., & Kniaź, A. (2019). Kompetencje cyfrowej w czasach cyfrowej dysrupcji. Studium wyzwań dla Polski w perspektywie roku 2030 [Digital competencies in times of digital disruption: A study of challenges for Poland by 2030]. Stowarzyszenie Miasta w Internecie, Fundacja Naukowa Evidence Institute.

Hong, J-C., Liu, Y., & Zhao, L. (2021). High school students’ online learning ineffectiveness in experimental courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738695

Jiménez-Hernández, D., González-Calatayud, V., Torres-Soto, A., Martínez Mayoral, A., & Morales, J. (2020). Digital competence of future secondary school teachers: Differences according to gender, age, and branch of knowledge. Sustainability, 12(22), 9473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229473

Klichowski, M., Bonanno, P., Jaskulska, S., Smaniotto Costa, C., de Lange, M., & Klauser, F. R. (2015). CyberParks as a new context for smart education: Theoretical background, assumptions, and pre-service teachers’ rating. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(12A), 1–10. DOI:10.12691/education-3-12A-1

Njoku, C. P. (2015). Information and communication technologies to raise quality of teaching and learning in higher education institutions. The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 11(1), 122–147.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. From On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

Prensky, M. (2009). Homo sapiens digital: From digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Journal of Online Education, 5(3).

Puentedura, R. R. (2010). SAMR and TPACK: Intro to advanced practice. http://hippasus.com/resources/sweden2010/SAMR_TPCK_IntroToAdvancedPractice.pdf

Rheingold, H. (2007). The tools for cultural production and distribution are in the pockets of 14 year olds. https://www.edge.org/q2007/q07_2.html#rheingold

Sakkir, G., Dollah, S., & Ahmad, J. (2021). E-Learning in COVID-19 situation: Students’ perception. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 1(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline378

Tejedor, S., Cervi, L., Pérez-Escoda, A., & Jumbo, F. T. (2020). Digital literacy and higher education during COVID-19 lockdown: Spain, Italy, and Ecuador. Publications, 8(48). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8040048

Thompson, D. (2018). A compendious history of distance education. Saylor Academy. https://www.saylor.org/2018/09/blog-a-compendious-history-of-distance-education

Zahorska, M. (2020). Sukces czy porażka zdalnego nauczania? [Success or failure of remote learning?]. Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego.

Published
2023-06-30
How to Cite
Kinal, J., & Kinal, M. (2023). Digital Natives in the Non-Digital University: A Case Study of Polish Higher Educational Institutions from an Educational and Historical Perspective. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education, 12(1 (23), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2023.1223.14
Section
2023 Innovations in Education for Developing Skills and Competences