The Process of Pedagogical Diagnosis and its Components in the Opinion of Teachers of Mainstream and Inclusive Schools - Research Report (Part 2).
Abstract
Taking appropriate actions to stimulate the development of the student and to support his/her delayed or disturbed spheres of development requires recognition of the problem by conducting a diagnosis aimed at getting to know the examined child and their difficulties. The purpose of the study was to find out the opinions of teachers of mainstream and integrated schools on the process of pedagogical diagnosis and its components and their selected determinants. The study used the method of a diagnostic survey carried out with the use of the questionnaire technique. The questionnaire consisted of two parts. The first part consisted of two open-ended questions concerning the understanding of the idea of diagnosis and therapy by the surveyed teachers. The second part consisted of closed (categorized) questions related to various aspects of the process of pedagogical diagnosis and therapy. For the purpose of this article, only the responses from part two of the questionnaire related to the process of diagnosis and its components were analysed. The research presented here refers to the evaluations of the process of pedagogical diagnosis including its most important components emerging from the beliefs of the surveyed teachers of mainstream and inclusive schools working with children with special educational needs. In addition, the analysis of the research results shows the perception of the process of pedagogical diagnosis by the surveyed teachers from the perspective of its selected components, which made it possible for us to determine the structure of this process crystallized in the opinions of teachers of mainstream and inclusive schools. Significant statistical differences were found in relation to the indication of knowledge and communication as important components of the process of pedagogical diagnosis by teachers of mainstream schools with additional qualifications.
References
Bartuś, E. (2011). Kompetencje diagnostyczne i kreatywne nauczycieli a ich postawy wobec integracji szkolnej. Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa.
Czaja-Chudyba, I. (2013). Dylematy i kierunki rozwoju zdolności uczniów w przestrzeni współczesnych zmian cywilizacyjnych. Pedagogika Przedszkolna i Wczesnoszkolna, 1(2), 7–20.
Czerepaniak-Walczak, M. (1997). Aspekty i źródła profesjonalnej refleksji nauczyciela. Edytor.
Hajnicz, W. (2013). Diagnozowanie w trakcie sytuacji edukacyjnej. W: W. Hajnicz i A. Konieczna (red.), Diagnozowanie kompetencji dzieci w procesie edukacyjnym (s. 28–42). Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
Nowak, J. (2009). Kompetencje nauczyciela jako klucz do efektywnej edukacji małego dziecka. W: B. Kasacova i M. Cabanova (red.), Učitel’ v preprimárnej a prymárnej edukácii. Teória, výskum, vývoj (s. 219–226). Univerzita Mateja Bela.
Paluchowski, W.J. (2012). Diagnoza psychologiczna. Proces, narzędzia, standardy. Oficyna Wydawnicza Łośgraf.
Skibska, J. i Twaróg-Kanus, A. (2022). Składowe procesu diagnozy pedagogicznej i ich postrzeganie przez nauczycieli szkół ogólnodostępnych i integracyjnych – raport z badań (cz. 1). Edukacja Elementarna w Teorii i Praktyce, 17(3)66, 103–117.
Szkolak-Stępień, A. (2017). Nauczyciele wczesnej edukacji wobec problemu diagnozowania specyficznych trudności w uczeniu się. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Pedagogicznego.
Wójtowicz-Szefler, M. (2018). Diagnozowanie rozwoju małego dziecka. Cz. 1. Difin.
Copyright (c) 2023 Elementary Education in Theory and Practice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- When submitting a text, the author declares that he/she is the Author of the article (hereinafter referred to as the “Work”) and:
- he/she owns the exclusive and unlimited copyright to the Work,
- is entitled to dispose of the copyright to the Work.
Declares that it does not infringe any third party copyrights or legal rights.
Declares that there is no conflict of interest.
2. At the same time, the Author grants the Ignatianum University in Cracowa royalty-free, non-exclusive and territorially unlimited licence to use the Work in the following fields of exploitation:
- recording the Work in a hard copy, as well as on a digital or magnetic medium;
- reproduction of the Work using any technique, without limitation of the number of editions or copies;
- distribution of the Work and its copies on any medium, including marketing, sale, lending, and rental;
- introduction of the Work into a computer memory;
- disseminating the Work in information networks, including in the Internet;
- public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the Work available to the public in such a way that everyone can have access to it at a time and place of their own choosing;
- within the scope of dependent rights to the Work, including in particular the right to make necessary changes to the Work resulting from editorial and methodical development, as well as to translate the Work into foreign languages;
The licence is granted from the moment of the transfer of the Work to the Ignatianum University in Cracow. The Ignatianum University in Cracow is entitled to grant further sub-licences to the Work within the scope of the right granted. The licence is time-limited and it is granted for a period of 15 years, starting from the date of its granting.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their text online (e.g. in their institution’s repository or on the institution’s website) before or during the submission process as this may lead to beneficial exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published text (See The Effect of Open Access). We recommend using any of the following portals of research associations:
- ResearchGate
- SSRN
- Academia.edu
- Selected Works
- Academic Search
