The Role of a Communication Barriers Miniscreening Tool in Speech-Language Preventive Practice for Neurodiverse Students in School Settings

Keywords: speech-language prevention, neurodiversity, communication barriers, Universal Design for Learning (UDL), miniscreening

Abstract

The concept of neurodiversity emphasizes the natural diversity of students’ cognitive, linguistic, and communicative functioning, which poses an important challenge for contemporary schooling and speech-language practice. In inclusive education, communication difficulties are increasingly understood as barriers emerging in the interaction between the student and the educational environment rather than solely as a result of individual developmental deficits. The aim of this article is to present and analyze a communication barriers miniscreening tool as an original, prediagnostic observational instrument used in speech-language preventive practice in school settings, with particular relevance for neurodiverse students. The article adopts a theoretical-methodological perspective and outlines the structure and intended use of the tool. It is situated within the classical three-tier model of prevention and within a framework of universal, selective, and indicated interventions, with a focus on the early identification of communication barriers in natural school situations. The miniscreening supports decisions regarding further forms of speech-language support and modifications of the educational environment. It is emphasized that the tool does not replace specialist assessment but constitutes an element of preventive practice aimed at reducing communication barriers and strengthening students’ participation in the educational process.

References

CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2 [Guidelines]. CAST. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/more/downloads

Clegg, J., Hollis, C., Mawhood, L. i Rutter, M. (2005). Developmental language disorders: A follow-up in later adult life. Cognitive, language and psychosocial outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(2), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00342.x

Constantino, C.D., Campbell, P. i Simpson, S. (2022). Stuttering and the social model. Journal of Communication Disorders, 96, 106200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106200

Cywińska, M. (red.). (2017). Rozwijanie umiejętności językowych i komunikacyjnych dziecka: Wybrane aspekty. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.

Dockrell, J.E. i Marshall, C.R. (2015). Measurement issues: Assessing language skills in young children. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20(2), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12072

Doyle, N. (2020). Neurodiversity at work: A biopsychosocial model and the impact on working adults. British Medical Bulletin, 135(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa021

Dwyer, P. (2022). The neurodiversity approach(es): What are they and what do they mean for researchers? Human Development, 66(2), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000523723

Hulme, C. i Snowling, M.J. (2020). Children’s language skills can be improved: Lessons from psychological science for educational policy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420923684

Kamykowska, J., Łuniewska, M., Banasik-Jemielniak, N., Czaplewska, E., Kochańska, M., Krajewski, G., Maryniak, A., Wiejak, K. i Krasowicz-Kupis, G. (2025). Co-occurrence and cognitive basis of low language and low reading skills in children speaking a transparent language. Reading and Writing, 38(11), 765–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10537-4

Meyer, A., Rose, D.H. i Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.

Norbury, C.F., Gooch, D., Wray, C., Baird, G., Charman, T., Simonoff, E., Vamvakas, G. i Pickles, A. (2016). The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: Evidence from a population study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(11), 1247–1257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12573

O’Connell, M.E., Boat, T. i Warner, K.E. (red.). (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. National Academies Press.

Otrębski, W., Mariańczyk, K., Amilkiewicz-Marek, A., Bieńkowska, K.I., Domagała-Zyśk, E., Kostrubiec-Wojtachnio, B., Papuda-Dolińska, B. i Pisula, E. (2022). Standardy przebiegu oceny funkcjonalnej oraz planowania wsparcia edukacyjno-specjalistycznego. Wydawnictwo KUL.

Skorek, E.M. (2023). Profilaktyka w logopedii: Wybrane zagadnienia. Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”.

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718

Węsierska, K. (red.). (2012). Profilaktyka logopedyczna w praktyce edukacyjnej. T. 1. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.

World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health

World Health Organization. (2004). Prevention of mental disorders. Effective interventions and policy options. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/43027/924159215X_eng.pdf

Ziegenfusz, S., Paynter, J., Westerveld, M.F. i Trembath, D. (2022). A systematic review of the academic achievement of primary and secondary school-aged students with developmental language disorder. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 7, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/23969415221099397

Published
2026-06-30
How to Cite
Kądziołka, D. (2026). The Role of a Communication Barriers Miniscreening Tool in Speech-Language Preventive Practice for Neurodiverse Students in School Settings. Elementary Education in Theory and Practice, 21(2(81), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.35765/eetp.2026.2181.08