Autonomy in Outdoor Education

Educators’ Perspectives

Keywords: outdoor education, autonomy, Self-Determination Theory, qualitative research, thematic analysis, youth development

Abstract

This article explores how autonomy is understood and supported in outdoor education. The aim of the study was to examine educators’ perspectives on autonomy and its role in learning processes in outdoor settings. A qualitative research design was employed, using semi-structured interviews with 13 outdoor educators working with children and youth in the United States. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings indicate that autonomy in outdoor education is embodied, relational, and context-dependent. It is expressed through direct engagement with environmental challenges, opportunities for choice, and participation in group processes. Educators reported that autonomy enhances intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, and social development. Outdoor environments were found to support the integration of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, in line with Self-Determination Theory. The study highlights the importance of autonomy-supportive practices, including flexibility, trust-building, and balancing freedom with structure and safety. The results suggest that outdoor education offers a unique context for fostering autonomy as meaningful participation rather than individual independence.

References

Arystoteles. (2009). Metafizyka (W. Witwicki, tłum.). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Association for Experiential Education. (n.d.). What is experiential education. https://www.aee.org/what-is-experiential-education

Bąk, A., Leśny, A., & Palamer-Kabacińska, E. (Eds.). (2020). Przygoda w edukacji i edukacja w przygodzie: outdoor i adventure education w Polsce. Fundacja Pracownia Nauki i Przygody.

Becker, C., Lauterbach, G., Spengler, S., Dettweiler, U., & Mess, F. (2017). Effects of regular classes in outdoor education settings: A systematic review on students’ learning, social and health dimensions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(5), 485.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Burch, G.F., Giambatista, R., Batchelor, J.H., Burch, J.J., Hoover, J.D., & Heller, N.A. (2019). A meta‐analysis of the relationship between experiential learning and learning outcomes. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 17(3), 239–273.

Cordeiro, P., Paixão, P., Lens, W., Lacante, M., & Luyckx, K. (2016). The Portuguese validation of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale: Concurrent and longitudinal relations to well-being and ill-being. Psychologica Belgica, 56(3), 193–209.

Crosby, A. (1981). A critical look: The philosophical foundations of experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 4(1), 9–15.

Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

Dewey, J. (1985). Democracy and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey, 1899–1924 (vol. 9). Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1916)

Dobosz-Leszczyńska, W. (Ed.). (2024). Osiągnięcia matematyczne i przyrodnicze czwartoklasistów. TIMSS 2023: trendy, wyzwania, perspektywy. Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych.

Frank, L. (2004). Journey towards the caring classroom: Using adventure to create community. Wood N Barnes.

Gass, M.A., “Lee” Gillis, HL., Russell, K.C. (2020). Adventure therapy: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Kolb, D.A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Pearson Education.

Kong, Y. (2021). The role of experiential learning on students’ motivation and classroom engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 771272.

Korczak, J. (1907). Szkoła życia. Przegląd Społeczny, 7, 19, 28.

Lejzerowicz, M., & Galbarczyk, M. (2020). Autonomia ucznia a proces indywidualizacji w edukacji włączającej. Rozprawy Społeczne, 14(3), 49–62.

Łoskot, M. (2025). Autonomy in experiential education from practitioner’s perspective [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Warsaw.

Mann, J., Gray, T., & Truong, S. (2022). Rediscovering the potential of outdoor learning for developing 21st century competencies. In R. Jucker & J. von Au (Eds.), High-quality outdoor learning: Evidence-based education outside the classroom for children, teachers and society (pp. 211–229). Springer International Publishing.

OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume V): Learning strategies and attitudes for life. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c2e44201-en

Priest, S., & Gass, M. (2018). Effective leadership in adventure programming (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics.

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

Schrooyen, C., Soenens, B., Waterschoot, J., Vermote, B., Morbée, S., Beyers, W., Brenning, K., Dieleman, L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J. & Vansteenkiste, M. (2021). Parental identity as a resource for parental adaptation during the COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(8), 1053–1064.

Schoel, J., Prouty, D., & Radcliffe, P. (1988). Islands of healing: A guide to adventure based counseling. Project Adventure, Inc.

Szulawski, M., & Szapiro, J. (2016). W kierunku motywacji wewnętrznej w edukacji: Implikacje teorii autodeterminacji w środowisku szkolnym. Psychologia Wychowawcza, 52(10), 257–266.

Uhrmacher, P.B. (1995). Uncommon schooling: A historical look at Rudolf Steiner, anthroposophy, and Waldorf education. Curriculum Inquiry, 25(4), 381–406.

Uyen, B.P., Tong, D.H., & Lien, N.B. (2022, April). The effectiveness of experiential learning in teaching arithmetic and geometry in sixth grade. Frontiers in Education, 7, 858631.

Wehmeyer, M.L., Shogren, K.A., Little, T.D., Lopez, S.J. (Eds.). (2017). Development of self-determination through the life-course. Springer Netherlands.

Published
2026-09-30
How to Cite
Łoskot, M. (2026). Autonomy in Outdoor Education: Educators’ Perspectives. Elementary Education in Theory and Practice, 21(3(82), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.35765/eetp.2026.2182.07