Students of Teacher Training Programs and Their Views on STEM: A Focus Interview

Keywords: STEM, education, preschool, pedagogy students, kitchen as a laboratory, KLab4Kids

Abstract

This paper presents the outcomes of a pilot study conducted with a group of students pursuing teacher training programs as part of the international research project called “Kitchen Lab for Kids” delivered under the “Erasmus+; Key Action 2” scheme. The aim of the research was to find out about students’ opinions on STEM education, including the determination of the level of their knowledge about this trend. In this context, particular attention was paid to issues related to the goals of STEM education, problems and challenges that they may generate, as well as the needs (organizational conditions) necessary to implement this type of activity. The respondents also had the opportunity to present their own experiences in organizing and conducting STEM classes. The research was carried out with the use of the qualitative methods, where the basic research method was focus interview. The research group consisted of 8 students of teaching faculties, mainly pre-school and early school education. The selection of research units was purposeful. The conducted qualitative analysis of the material collected during the focus interview showed that STEM education is still a novelty among students of teaching faculties. Future teachers have little experience in the implementation of activities taking into account the STEM model, but it should be expected that the coming years will result in a number of changes and activities in this area.

References

Bybee R.W. (2010). What is STEM education?, “Science”, vol. 329, no. 5995, p. 996. DOI: 10.1126/science.1194998.
Early Childhood STEM Working Group (2017). Early STEM Matters: Providing High-Quality STEM Experiences for All Young Learners: A Policy Report by the Early Childhood STEM Working Group, http://d3lwefg3pyezlb.cloudfront.net/docs/Early_STEM_Matters_FINAL.pdf (accessed: 01.12.2019).
Gonzalez H.B., Kuenzi J.J. (2012). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Primer, http://www.stemedcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/STEM-Education-Primer.pdf (accessed: 01.12.2019).
Hoffman R. (1959). Homogeneity of member personality and its effect on group problem-solving, “Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology”, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 27–32.
Hoffman R., Maier N.R.F. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogenous groups, „Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology”, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 401–407.
Krueger R.A., Casey M.A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
Lisek-Michalska J. (2013). Badania fokusowe. Problemy metodologiczne i etyczne, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Plebańska M., Trojańska K. (2018). Steam Lessons, Warszawa: Elitera.
STEM Sprouts. Science, Technology, Engineering & Maths: Teaching Guide. (2013), https://www.bostonchildrensmuseum.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/STEMGuide.pdf (accessed: 07.12.2019).
Williams M. (2003). Making sense of social research, Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
Published
2021-09-30
How to Cite
Szczotka, M., & Szewczuk, K. (2021). Students of Teacher Training Programs and Their Views on STEM: A Focus Interview. Elementary Education in Theory and Practice, 16(3(61), 115-137. https://doi.org/10.35765/eetp.2021.1661.08